> Finally, SMMSTORE: it exists, it helps where it is supported to persist
> UEFI variables, but as I understand it, actual support for devices is
> rather limited.
> SMMSTORE_V2 is fully working with the current coreboot default option
> for Tianocore (UEFIPAYLOAD), and is selected by default.
We
# 12 October 2021 - coreboot EFI working group
## Objective:
Linux is expecting more and more to use EFI supplied interfaces (UEFI
Boot Services in particular, even if many are stubbed out) so like it or
not, we’re going to need to support these interfaces. How do we approach
this without turning
thanks for getting this set up Patrick!
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 1:10 PM Patrick Georgi via coreboot
wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> To facilitate cooperation on UEFI-as-a-payload work, we established a mirror
> of tianocore's edk2 repo at https://review.coreboot.org/edk2. Unlike other
> mirrors on
Hi everybody,
To facilitate cooperation on UEFI-as-a-payload work, we established a
mirror of tianocore's edk2 repo at https://review.coreboot.org/edk2. Unlike
other mirrors on review.coreboot.org, it's open for development.
It's updated regularly, but the default branch that we set up,
coreboot-
contest is a coming standard. The companies I work with have moved away
from python test frameworks. Familiarity did not breed respect for python
test frameworks.
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 7:31 AM Jack Rosenthal wrote:
> Both bats and expect seem problematic for Ricardo's use case ...
> generating
Both bats and expect seem problematic for Ricardo's use case ... generating
the elog binary format in these tools seems difficult, bash wasn't really
meant for generating C structs.
One huge advantage of pytest is that it's fairly industry standard at this
point. There's a good number of people wh
I set up a raspberry pi as a device under test with contest, and ran
the contest controller in a mode that needed no mysql, and it took
about 14 minutes.
I'd still recommend looking at contest. I've found it very easy to use
and I am very new to it.
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 7:02 AM Patrick Georgi
Hi Ricardo,
sorry for the late response, and that your project fell a bit by the
wayside. I guess discussion configuration frameworks is more attractive to
this community than testing frameworks (which also explains why we have ~3
config frameworks and only ~1 testing frameworks ;-) )
So yes, tes
8 matches
Mail list logo