[coreboot] [coreboot - Bug #456] (Resolved) coreboot 4.19 tarballs have bad timestamps

Issue #456 has been updated by Felix Singer. Status changed from Feedback to Resolved Thanks for confirming :) Bug #456: coreboot 4.19 tarballs have bad timestamps https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/456#change-1421 * Author: Thierry Laurion * Status:

[coreboot] [coreboot - Bug #456] coreboot 4.19 tarballs have bad timestamps

Issue #456 has been updated by Thierry Laurion. % Done changed from 0 to 100 Bug #456: coreboot 4.19 tarballs have bad timestamps https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/456#change-1420 * Author: Thierry Laurion * Status: Feedback * Priority: High * Category:

[coreboot] [coreboot - Bug #456] coreboot 4.19 tarballs have bad timestamps

Issue #456 has been updated by Thierry Laurion. Martin Roth wrote in #note-3: > New 4.19 tarballs have been pushed, but they use the same name. I updated > the release notes stating that they had been updated. > > I looked at changing the name, but to do that, the actual release number >

[coreboot] [coreboot - Bug #445] Thinkpad X200 wifi issue

Issue #445 has been updated by Masc Masc. I would like to add a latest update. I have been having the wifi card problem intermittently and I decided to change it. I purchased another Atheros AR5B95 and so far the problem seems resolved (I have been testing it for a few days and the issue seems

[coreboot] [coreboot - Refactoring #460] Make mainboards using the variant concept

Issue #460 has been updated by Nico Huber. I mean `lga1155` and `lga1150` respectively. Refactoring #460: Make mainboards using the variant concept https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/460#change-1417 * Author: Felix Singer * Status: New * Priority:

[coreboot] [coreboot - Refactoring #460] Make mainboards using the variant concept

Issue #460 has been updated by Nico Huber. It's actually quite simple to put an accurate name on it: Use something that is soldered to the mainboard. In case of platform code that supports multiple chipsets, it's usually the CPU socket that they have in common. `lga1155` should work here and

[coreboot] [coreboot - Other #314] (Closed (locked)) Please disable 'administrator approval' on ticket.coreboot.org

Issue #314 has been updated by Felix Singer. Status changed from Response Needed to Closed (locked) @akjuxr3, you are doing very strong accusations against the project and the administrators of this service without providing any proof. Since I am administrating this service, I am taking this

[coreboot] [coreboot - Other #314] Please disable 'administrator approval' on ticket.coreboot.org

Issue #314 has been updated by Felix Singer. Tracker changed from Support to Other Other #314: Please disable 'administrator approval' on ticket.coreboot.org https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/314#change-1414 * Author: akjuxr3 akjuxr3 * Status: Response

[coreboot] [coreboot - Refactoring #460] Make mainboards using the variant concept

Issue #460 has been updated by Nicholas Chin. akjuxr3 akjuxr3 wrote in #note-1: > I vote against renaming any x7x board to ivybridge. Ivybridge is the CPU you > put into the x7x board. Not the board itself. > If you put a sandybridge CPU into the socket of the h77pro4-m, then its still >