Yes, nice job Werner!
Since you’ve been working on Elkhart Lake, can I inquire if you have booted it
to an OS via eMMC and/or iPXE using coreboot? If so, with which payload?
Thanks,
- Jay
From: ron minnich
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2022 7:02 PM
To: Zeh, Werner
Cc: coreboot
Ok, I'm running into the same issue on an Ubuntu 16.04 system.
$ git clone https://review.coreboot.org/coreboot.git
Cloning into 'coreboot'...
fatal: unable to access 'https://review.coreboot.org/coreboot.git/': server
certificate verification failed. CAfile: /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt
Unfortunately, for the Denverton SoC (C3000 series), the APIC ID of the first
core is not always the same. For 16-core SKUs, it’s always 0, but for SKUs with
a lower number of cores, it may be a different number. It’s also possible (but
not confirmed) that for a particular SKU (other than
would break the builds from
this branch.
Thanks,
- Jay
Jay Talbott
Principal Consulting Engineer
SysPro Consulting, LLC
3057 E. Muirfield St.
Gilbert, AZ 85298
(480) 704-8045
(480) 445-9895 (FAX)
jaytalb...@sysproconsulting.com
http://www.sysproconsulting.com
> -Original Message-
>
device is detected.
So the whole purpose of the PCIe hot plug settings in the FSP are simply to
keep the root port from being automatically disabled if no device is connected
to it at boot time. That’s all it does.
- Jay
Jay Talbott
Principal Consulting Engineer
SysPro Consulting, LLC
3057 E
discovered in the original implementation.
Without actually looking at the code, I believe both of these can be fixed
in src/soc/intel/denverton_ns/cpu.c.
- Jay
Jay Talbott
Principal Consulting Engineer
SysPro Consulting, LLC
3057 E. Muirfield St.
Gilbert, AZ 85298
(480) 704-8045
(480) 445-9895
, I’ll see if I can get someone at Intel to look at
it. I agree that it is problematic when what’s on the public FSP GitHub isn’t
the latest version of the FSP and headers and such that people are actually
using. This should defiantly be corrected.
- Jay
Jay Talbott
Principal Consulting
things
and don't have the bandwidth to look into it deeper, but at least we have a
pretty good idea of where the problem lies.
- Jay
Jay Talbott
Principal Consulting Engineer
SysPro Consulting, LLC
3057 E. Muirfield St.
Gilbert, AZ 85298
(480) 704-8045
(480) 445-9895 (FAX)
jaytalb
point somebody needs to dig into the actual code in smmrelocate.c
and identify the root cause of the actual race condition. We just haven't
had the time to do any further investigation into the root cause since we
have a working workaround.
Hope that helps...
- Jay
Jay Talbott
Principal Consulting
Correction. I mean it successfully built and booted coreboot + a BuildRoot
linux kernel payload (not SeaBIOS) on the Camelback Mountain CRB.
- Jay
Jay Talbott
Principal Consulting Engineer
SysPro Consulting, LLC
3057 E. Muirfield St.
Gilbert, AZ 85298
(480) 704-8045
(480) 445-9895 (FAX)
jaytalb
We successfully built and booted coreboot + SeaBIOS on the Camelback Mountain
CRB yesterday based on the head of the coreboot master branch.
- Jay
Jay Talbott
Principal Consulting Engineer
SysPro Consulting, LLC
3057 E. Muirfield St.
Gilbert, AZ 85298
(480) 704-8045
(480) 445-9895 (FAX)
jaytalb
Jay Talbott
Principal Consulting Engineer
SysPro Consulting, LLC
3057 E. Muirfield St.
Gilbert, AZ 85298
(480) 704-8045
(480) 445-9895 (FAX)
jaytalb...@sysproconsulting.com
http://www.sysproconsulting.com
> -Original Message-
> From: coreboot [mailto:coreboot-boun...@corebo
> From: Patrick Georgi [mailto:pgeo...@google.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 4:23 AM
> To: mikeb...@gmail.com
> Cc: Nico Huber; jaytalb...@sysproconsulting.com; coreboot
> Subject: Re: [coreboot] Further coreboot releases, setting new standards
>
> Am Do., 29. Nov. 2018 um 11:59 Uhr
> -Original Message-
> From: Arthur Heymans [mailto:art...@aheymans.xyz]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 6:26 AM
> To: Jay Talbott
> Cc: Patrick Georgi via coreboot; Patrick Georgi
> Subject: Re: [coreboot] Further coreboot releases, setting new standards
>
&g
Hi Paul,
> -Original Message-
> From: coreboot [mailto:coreboot-boun...@coreboot.org] On Behalf Of Paul
> Menzel
> Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2018 7:29 AM
> To: Jay Talbott; Arthur Heymans; Patrick Georgi
> Cc: coreboot@coreboot.org
> Subject: Re: [coreboot] Furt
I know I don't post much here, but I feel like I need to chime in on this thread... Perhaps it's time that SysPro becomes a louder voice in the community.Bay Trail and Broadwell DE are both still very popular platforms, yet neither one of them meets the cut for any of the three criteria. So I
to this problem, or an
understanding of why it only impacts Broadwell-DE, and yet isn't a problem on
the Intel Camelback Mountain reference board? Since it's not reproducible on
the Intel reference board, we can't get much support out of Intel on this one...
Thanks,
- Jay
Jay Talbott
Principal
other bad
things to happen.
I thought it best to bring this up to the coreboot community, since this
could easily be a problem on any/all platforms that don't have a legacy UART
(or a UART that can be put into legacy mode). Has anybody else run into this
and/or thought about a general solution t
have in the
system.
Thanks,
- Jay
Jay Talbott
Principal Consulting Engineer
SysPro Consulting, LLC
3057 E. Muirfield St.
Gilbert, AZ 85298
(480) 704-8045
(480) 445-9895 (FAX)
jaytalb...@sysproconsulting.com
http://www.sysproconsulting.com
> -Original Message-
> From: A
on systems with larger amounts of RAM, so I figured I'd ask the
community what's the fix to getting this to work correctly with 16GB of RAM
before trying to figure it out myself.
Any help would be most appreciated.
Thanks,
- Jay
Jay Talbott
Principal Consulting Engineer
SysPro
it as an elf and use it as the primary payload for some
validation checks on the memory – the normal/production payload is a Linux
kernel.
Thanks,
- Jay
From: coreboot [mailto:coreboot-boun...@coreboot.org] On Behalf Of Martin Roth
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 10:18 AM
To: Jay Talbott
Cc
One of my colleagues is trying to build the memtest86+ payload, and is
running into build problems.
Build environment is Ubuntu 16.0.4 LTS.
Has anybody else run into this? Any guidance on how to resolve it?
I'm hoping it's just something simple that needs to be changed in the build
you can keep your changes is a directory tree separate from the
FOSS tree. Then during the build step your patches get applied and compiled
using another separate build tree.
Thanks,
- Jay
Jay Talbott
Principal Consulting Engineer
SysPro Consulting, LLC
3057 E. Muirfield St.
Gilbert, AZ
.
At least now I can finally start focusing on porting from the RVP7/RVP15
coreboot implementation to my client's board design...
- Jay
Jay Talbott
Principal Consulting Engineer
SysPro Consulting, LLC
3057 E. Muirfield St.
Gilbert, AZ 85298
(480) 704-8045
(480) 445-9895 (FAX)
jaytalb
e FSP was initially developed
to target Chromebooks. That being said, there's really no technical reason why
one couldn't be use for the other application, and vice versa, except that
support becomes a bit of a nightmare...
- Jay
Jay Talbott
Principal Consulting Engineer
SysPro Consulting, LLC
a working solution just this week.
I have no idea if/when the latest version of the FSP that I am now using which
actually works on the RVP7 and RVP15 will be publicly released. That’s
completely up to Intel.
Just speaking from personal experience…
- Jay
Jay Talbott
Principal
> I'm not sure what IFWI refers to. I thought it's only about the host
> firmware (i.e. the BIOS region of the flash). Make sure the other
> regions are restored as well. If you have an image of the factory
> firmware (not a backup), I'd try to flash that.
>
IFWI - Integrated Firmware Image
things to where they were before introducing coreboot,
but not in this case...
I'm dead in the water if the CRB is bricked...
- Jay
Jay Talbott
Principal Consulting Engineer
SysPro Consulting, LLC
3057 E. Muirfield St.
Gilbert, AZ 85298
(480) 704-8045
(480) 445-9895 (FAX)
jaytalb...@sysproconsulting.co
, as if it’s otherwise dead.
Furthermore, restoring the factory UEFI BIOS no longer boots either.
Now what? Any suggestions?
- Jay
Jay Talbott
Principal Consulting Engineer
SysPro Consulting, LLC
3057 E. Muirfield St.
Gilbert, AZ 85298
(480) 704-8045
(480) 445-9895 (FAX)
jaytalb
Hi Matt,
I’ll try XIP and see what happens… but how would that impact the UPD signature?
The signature is defined in
coreboot/src/vendorcode/intel/fsp/fsp2_0/skykabylake/FspUpd.h, as well as in
FspUpd.h in the headers included with the FSP on GitHub.
- Jay
Jay Talbott
Principal
us folks, including the
individual that upstreamed the RVP7 support to coreboot and the individual
who published the FSP to GitHub, which remain unanswered.
Any help from the coreboot community would be most appreciated!
Thanks!
- Jay
Jay Talbott
Principal Consulting Engineer
SysPro Consulting, LL
rmore, I have yet to get the serial console working on the DB-9 serial
port. I have the jumpers on the board configured to connect it to UART #2,
and configured in coreboot accordingly, but I get nothing for console
output.
Any help would be most appreciated!
Thanks,
- Jay
Jay Talb
The FSP is rebased with the Intel BCT tool, not the FITC tool.
> On Apr 8, 2016, at 7:38 AM, Martin Roth wrote:
>
> Not knowing which platform this is makes it a little harder to
> determine what's locked in place. We'd also need to know if this is
> getting built from the
33 matches
Mail list logo