-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Are there any status updates on this?
>
> I noticed that some people still haven't paid up and we're a couple
> grand short.
That is correct; unfortunately we're still waiting for the remaining
payments. I'm checking with Martin to see if we've
Are there any status updates on this?
I noticed that some people still haven't paid up and we're a couple
grand short.
- Thanks
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
After campaign close, we have funded three of the four stretch goals!
In addition to providing the base BMC port, we will be adding support
for the KGPE-D16 BMC to Flashrom, adding support for the IPMI remote
serial console, and enabling BMC-based
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/08/2017 02:51 PM, taii...@gmx.com wrote:
> Hey Tim could you elaborate on the IBM OpenBMC stretch goal? Technical
> details, benefits etc as I don't have any POWER systems I don't know
> what it is.
>
> - Thanks
The IBM OpenBMC fork is under
Hey Tim could you elaborate on the IBM OpenBMC stretch goal? Technical
details, benefits etc as I don't have any POWER systems I don't know
what it is.
- Thanks
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/08/2017 12:52 PM, c...@imap.cc wrote:
> That's great news. I notice that the goal amounts for the serial console
> access and thermal management have increased. Why is that?
>
>
That's great news. I notice that the goal amounts for the serial console
access and thermal management have increased. Why is that?
http://web.archive.org/web/20170221164151/https://www.raptorengineering.com/coreboot/kgpe-d16-bmc-port-offer.php
On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, at 18:01, Timothy Pearson
On 2017-03-07 at 04:29, taii...@gmx.com wrote:
> Today I noticed a new stretch goal about flashrom support (kinda late in
> the game), it seems pretty important to have this so I think that the
> stretch goal funding should be extended.
Fortunately, that stretch goal is now already funded.
> I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A quick update on the OpenBMC port funding status for the KGPE-D16.
I am pleased to announce that we have funded two of the stretch goals,
with a third currently sitting at 62%! There are still three days
remaining, so if you would like to help one
Today I noticed a new stretch goal about flashrom support (kinda late in
the game), it seems pretty important to have this so I think that the
stretch goal funding should be extended.
I had assumed that the BMC firmware would be stored in and loaded from
the main coreboot flash image, or that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/28/2017 11:44 AM, Martin Roth wrote:
> Yes, the FSF sent out an email on Friday, and that's helped get the
> community funding portion from 60% up to where we are now at at 92%.
>
> Martin
I am pleased to announce that the base OpenBMC port
Yes, the FSF sent out an email on Friday, and that's helped get the
community funding portion from 60% up to where we are now at at 92%.
Martin
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 5:41 PM, taii...@gmx.com wrote:
> On 02/27/2017 02:16 PM, Timothy Pearson wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED
On 02/27/2017 02:16 PM, Timothy Pearson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A brief update on the funding status of the BMC port for the KGPE-D16:
As of today we have reached around 89% of the needed community support,
and around 95% of the total base goal! To see if some of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A brief update on the funding status of the BMC port for the KGPE-D16:
As of today we have reached around 89% of the needed community support,
and around 95% of the total base goal! To see if some of the stretch
goals may be of interest to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/20/2017 06:56 PM, taii...@gmx.com wrote:
> Hey maybe a stupid question but why not port OpenBMC to a pci-e card
> instead? then it would have wider compatibility instead of just being
> for a single board.
The costs would increase
Hey maybe a stupid question but why not port OpenBMC to a pci-e card
instead? then it would have wider compatibility instead of just being
for a single board.
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A brief update on the funding status of the BMC port for the KGPE-D16:
With the campaign ending in a little over a week, we are currently
sitting at around 61% of the needed community support, and around 85% of
the total funding goal. Full details
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A brief update on the funding status of the BMC port for the KGPE-D16:
We have posted a dedicated page with details on the port offer, who is
funding the work thus far, and current funding level here:
18 matches
Mail list logo