Hello,
Does anyone know the mathematical formula for converting memory clock cycles
into microseconds (us)??
Thanks,
Joseph Smith
Set-Top-Linux
www.settoplinux.org
--
coreboot mailing list
coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
Hello,
Does anyone know the mathematical formula for converting memory clock
cycles
into microseconds (us)??
1 MHz means 1 million clock cycles per second, so 1 clock cycle per
microsecond.
166 MHz - 166 clock cycles per microsecond.
Thanks,
Myles
--
coreboot mailing list
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 09:53:02 -0600, Myles Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone know the mathematical formula for converting memory clock
cycles
into microseconds (us)??
1 MHz means 1 million clock cycles per second, so 1 clock cycle per
microsecond.
166 MHz - 166 clock
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 01:06:08PM -0400, Joseph Smith wrote:
Does anyone know the mathematical formula for converting memory
clock cycles into microseconds (us)??
1 MHz means 1 million clock cycles per second, so 1 clock cycle
per microsecond.
166 MHz - 166 clock cycles per
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 19:14:32 +0200, Peter Stuge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 01:06:08PM -0400, Joseph Smith wrote:
Does anyone know the mathematical formula for converting memory
clock cycles into microseconds (us)??
1 MHz means 1 million clock cycles per second, so
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 01:36:29PM -0400, Joseph Smith wrote:
Does anyone know the mathematical formula for converting memory
clock cycles into microseconds (us)??
1 MHz means 1 million clock cycles per second, so 1 clock cycle
per microsecond.
166 MHz - 166 clock cycles per
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 19:47:24 +0200, Peter Stuge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 01:36:29PM -0400, Joseph Smith wrote:
Does anyone know the mathematical formula for converting memory
clock cycles into microseconds (us)??
1 MHz means 1 million clock cycles per second,
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 05:48:11PM -0400, Joseph Smith wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 23:43:10 +0200, Peter Stuge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 03:15:46PM -0400, Joseph Smith wrote:
How hard would it be to add a nanoseconds delay to delay.h?
It would probably have to be a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Peter Stuge
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 6:03 PM
To: coreboot@coreboot.org
Subject: Re: [coreboot] Memory clock cycles - microseconds (us)
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 05:48:11PM -0400, Joseph Smith
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 09:37:45PM -0400, Joseph Smith wrote:
See where I am going with this?
Sorry, not at all.
Of course it would be nice to not spend more time than neccessary
on waits during RAM init.
But nanosecond precision is more difficult than microsecond
precision, and unless there
Busy wait is a loop of some number of NOP instructions, as opposed to
relying on some CPU peripheral such as a timer to signal elapsed
time. The number of NOP instructions has to be calculated from the
current CPU frequency.
That seems more complicated than it needs to be. Here is what I am
11 matches
Mail list logo