[coreboot] Re: Intel Atom C2000 SOC - Do they lack Intel ME?

Hi, I have heard an unverified rumour that Atom substitutes the ME for an ARM microcontroller running Trustzone. If this is the case however, it's possible it's only for bringup, in which case it's not too much different from the inaccessible micrcontrollers already present in most x86 silicon.

[coreboot] Re: Intel Atom C2000 SOC - Do they lack Intel ME?

Hallo Goetz, thanks for that information. I am aware of this bug, but i read that Intel released an PCB level workaround what hopefully supermicro has applied on my new bought board. As i have only one board atm what is now in a "Production System" i am not able to activly test it but for

[coreboot] Re: Intel Atom C2000 SOC - Do they lack Intel ME?

Hi Kinky, > i sadly had to replace KGPE-d16 board for my fileserver to a Supermicro > A1SRi-C2558 because of electric pill > > investigating a bit with intelmetool and mecleaner non of them could > found any sign for an ME-region in this board.. so i asking myself if > there is no

[coreboot] Re: Intel Atom C2000 SOC - Do they lack Intel ME?

> investigating a bit with intelmetool and mecleaner non of them could > found any sign for an ME-region in this board.. so i asking myself if > there is no ME/SPS on the intel C2000 socs, what would make them a DAMN > SEXY platform to port coreboot too. > I believe that the Intel FSP (firmware