[coreboot] Re: Question about compressed FIT payloads

2022-05-02 Thread Krystian Hebel
On 21.12.2021 20:34, Krystian Hebel wrote: On 18.12.2021 18:07, Nico Huber wrote: On 15.12.21 13:24, Krystian Hebel wrote: Hi Nico, On 15.12.2021 12:21, Nico Huber wrote: Hi Krystian, On 14.12.21 13:00, Krystian Hebel wrote: For our work on POWER9 coreboot port we were using Skiboot [1]

[coreboot] Re: Question about compressed FIT payloads

2021-12-21 Thread Krystian Hebel
On 18.12.2021 18:07, Nico Huber wrote: On 15.12.21 13:24, Krystian Hebel wrote: Hi Nico, On 15.12.2021 12:21, Nico Huber wrote: Hi Krystian, On 14.12.21 13:00, Krystian Hebel wrote: For our work on POWER9 coreboot port we were using Skiboot [1] packed into FIT payload. I might just miss

[coreboot] Re: Question about compressed FIT payloads

2021-12-19 Thread Nico Huber
On 15.12.21 13:24, Krystian Hebel wrote: > Hi Nico, > > On 15.12.2021 12:21, Nico Huber wrote: >> Hi Krystian, >> >> On 14.12.21 13:00, Krystian Hebel wrote: >>> For our work on POWER9 coreboot port we were using Skiboot [1] packed >>> into >>> FIT payload. >> I might just miss it because I never

[coreboot] Re: Question about compressed FIT payloads

2021-12-15 Thread Nico Huber
Hi Krystian, On 14.12.21 13:00, Krystian Hebel wrote: > For our work on POWER9 coreboot port we were using Skiboot [1] packed into > FIT payload. I might just miss it because I never worked with FIT, but maybe I'm not the only one: Can you elaborate why you chose FIT? Reading through your mail

[coreboot] Re: Question about compressed FIT payloads

2021-12-15 Thread Krystian Hebel
Hi Nico, On 15.12.2021 12:21, Nico Huber wrote: Hi Krystian, On 14.12.21 13:00, Krystian Hebel wrote: For our work on POWER9 coreboot port we were using Skiboot [1] packed into FIT payload. I might just miss it because I never worked with FIT, but maybe I'm not the only one: Can you