On 21.12.2021 20:34, Krystian Hebel wrote:
On 18.12.2021 18:07, Nico Huber wrote:
On 15.12.21 13:24, Krystian Hebel wrote:
Hi Nico,
On 15.12.2021 12:21, Nico Huber wrote:
Hi Krystian,
On 14.12.21 13:00, Krystian Hebel wrote:
For our work on POWER9 coreboot port we were using Skiboot [1]
On 18.12.2021 18:07, Nico Huber wrote:
On 15.12.21 13:24, Krystian Hebel wrote:
Hi Nico,
On 15.12.2021 12:21, Nico Huber wrote:
Hi Krystian,
On 14.12.21 13:00, Krystian Hebel wrote:
For our work on POWER9 coreboot port we were using Skiboot [1] packed
into
FIT payload.
I might just miss
On 15.12.21 13:24, Krystian Hebel wrote:
> Hi Nico,
>
> On 15.12.2021 12:21, Nico Huber wrote:
>> Hi Krystian,
>>
>> On 14.12.21 13:00, Krystian Hebel wrote:
>>> For our work on POWER9 coreboot port we were using Skiboot [1] packed
>>> into
>>> FIT payload.
>> I might just miss it because I never
Hi Krystian,
On 14.12.21 13:00, Krystian Hebel wrote:
> For our work on POWER9 coreboot port we were using Skiboot [1] packed into
> FIT payload.
I might just miss it because I never worked with FIT, but maybe I'm not
the only one: Can you elaborate why you chose FIT? Reading through your
mail
Hi Nico,
On 15.12.2021 12:21, Nico Huber wrote:
Hi Krystian,
On 14.12.21 13:00, Krystian Hebel wrote:
For our work on POWER9 coreboot port we were using Skiboot [1] packed into
FIT payload.
I might just miss it because I never worked with FIT, but maybe I'm not
the only one: Can you
5 matches
Mail list logo