Dear coreboot folks,
Am Donnerstag, den 16.01.2014, 15:56 +0100 schrieb gerrit code review: […] > Change subject: uio_usbdebug: User-space-i/o framework for usbdebug > ...................................................................... > > > Patch Set 1: […] > http://review.coreboot.org/#/c/4695/1/util/uio_usbdebug/device/device_util.c > File util/uio_usbdebug/device/device_util.c: > > Line 1: > > No header? > No code? > > > http://review.coreboot.org/#/c/4695/1/util/uio_usbdebug/device/pci_device.c > File util/uio_usbdebug/device/pci_device.c: > > Line 1: > > No header? > No code? I always thought every manually created file in the repository should have license (header). I think that such a rule is not necessarily required but I am not a lawyer. The GPL notes [1] advise to do, but as written it seems not to be legally necessary [2]. So could you (Ron, Stefan?) please clarify what to do in coreboot’s case? Thanks, Paul [1] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html [2] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3051651/open-source-licence-header-on-each-source-file-or-a-single-copying-or-both
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot