how to fix grafix in linux
--
coreboot mailing list
coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
Ühel kenal päeval, L, 2008-07-12 kell 13:56, kirjutas Uwe Hermann:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 08:21:58AM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:32 AM, Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 09:05:39AM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
This grows graphics mem to 16M
mart, did you try memtest on the dbe61?
thanks
ron
--
coreboot mailing list
coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 08:21:58AM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:32 AM, Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 09:05:39AM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
This grows graphics mem to 16M per artec's recommendation.
You mean 32MB? The comment says Video
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 09:05:39AM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
This grows graphics mem to 16M per artec's recommendation.
You mean 32MB? The comment says Video RAM has to be in 2MB chunks, so
either 16M is wrong, or the comment is wrong (?)
The patch is fine otherwise, but I cannot test...
Uwe.
This grows graphics mem to 16M per artec's recommendation.
The PLL autoconfig works now, so move to an auto value instead of
manual config.
This does not fix the problem with the memory errors. We've still got
something wrong in memory, and it is not clear what.
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 12:05 PM, ron minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This does not fix the problem with the memory errors. We've still got
something wrong in memory, and it is not clear what.
Does DBE62 have an unterminated memory interface? Can you compare MSR
0x4c0f from coreboot to a
On 09.07.2008 18:05, ron minnich wrote:
This grows graphics mem to 16M per artec's recommendation.
The PLL autoconfig works now, so move to an auto value instead of
manual config.
This does not fix the problem with the memory errors. We've still got
something wrong in memory, and it is not
8 matches
Mail list logo