I didnot enable the serial output. So the booting is fast.
Do you need me to add it back and try again?
Zheng
From: paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net
To: fishb...@hotmail.com
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 22:15:24 +0100
Subject: [coreboot] Incorrect time stamps on Olive Hill (was: Board status
upload
I tried with gcc 4.9.2 and got same result.
No need to upload the log file.
Zheng
From: paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net
To: fishb...@hotmail.com
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 22:15:24 +0100
Subject: [coreboot] Incorrect time stamps on Olive Hill (was: Board status
upload of AGESA board like ASUS
On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 17:51:27 +0100
Stefan Tauner wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 19:32:14 +0300
> Andrey Korolyov wrote:
>
> > BTW, are there still any FWH-capable romulators in production? Looks
> > like most of sockets from this era has been
I'm curious as to how you managed to brick the thing when reading - did you
apply the wrong voltage to the chip, or something?
On 23 Jan 2016 4:19 p.m., Kitestramuort wrote:
>
> On Sat, 23 Jan, 2016 at 3:27 PM, John Lewis wrote:
> > Thank Ron!
On Sun, 24 Jan, 2016 at 12:41 PM, John Lewis
wrote:
I'm curious as to how you managed to brick the thing when reading -
did you apply the wrong voltage to the chip, or something?
I think so. I had the charger and the 3.3V pin connected at the same
time.
However it's not
Dear Zheng,
Thank you very much!
Am Sonntag, den 24.01.2016, 07:28 + schrieb Zheng Bao:
> Hi, Paul,
> I made a timestamp log by the following steps.
> 1. Build coreboot with check "Create a table of timestamps collected
> during boot ". Run coreboot.
> 2. build cbmem on target machine.
>
6 matches
Mail list logo