Is there anything special that systemagent needs before it will actually
do something useful. I've tried to run it on a board with a H61 chipset,
and it just hangs at System Agent: Initializing PCH. I remember Damien
had a similar problem a few months back.
Alex
coreboot-4.0-5198-g2588498-dirty
Hello,
My name is Chris. I would like to adjust the coreboot to my DQ77KB
board.
For payload I used seabios. I managed to reach point when OS starts but
I have a problem with Intel ME PCI devices (ME1, ME2, KT, IDE-R). A
device manager in Windows7 reports an error 10 or 12 with these
On 05.01.2014 07:15, Gregg Levine wrote:
Part of the problem with laptops is that there is a thing on them
called an Embedded Controller, EC for short. Those devices do all of
the housekeeping chores that the main system has delegated to them.
For example certain functions are on it.
To
By now most boards and OS don't run correctly if ACPI tables are not
supplied. Ability by user to enable/disable their generation is just
increasing configuration matrix for no benefit. So I propose to hardwire
it to HAVE_ACPI_TABLES.
I feel like in current config there are too many options of
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 9:55 PM, dhan.war wardhan.v@gmail.com wrote:
hi all
i am using toshiba satellite c850d-m5010. the kvm is disabled by default
in BIOS. it seems to me that many laptop manufacturers does not fully
support kvm.
my output of the superiotool :
# superiotool
On Monday, January 06, 2014 07:52:20 PM Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
By now most boards and OS don't run correctly if ACPI tables are not
supplied. Ability by user to enable/disable their generation is just
increasing configuration matrix for no benefit. So I propose to
On 07.01.2014 00:12, mrnuke wrote:
On Monday, January 06, 2014 07:52:20 PM Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
By now most boards and OS don't run correctly if ACPI tables are not
supplied. Ability by user to enable/disable their generation is just
increasing configuration matrix
On Tuesday, January 07, 2014 03:57:22 AM Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
You misunderstood. I don't propose to remove HAVE_ACPI_TABLES.
HAVE_ACPI_TABLES remains per-board characteristic.
The only thing I remove is GENERATE_ACPI_TABLES which is user-visible
option.
This way
8 matches
Mail list logo