[coreboot] Systemagent hangs on PCH init with H61 chipset

2014-01-06 Thread Alex G.
Is there anything special that systemagent needs before it will actually do something useful. I've tried to run it on a board with a H61 chipset, and it just hangs at System Agent: Initializing PCH. I remember Damien had a similar problem a few months back. Alex coreboot-4.0-5198-g2588498-dirty

[coreboot] Coreboot for DQ77KB

2014-01-06 Thread Krzysztof Pierwieniecki
Hello, My name is Chris. I would like to adjust the coreboot to my DQ77KB board. For payload I used seabios. I managed to reach point when OS starts but I have a problem with Intel ME PCI devices (ME1, ME2, KT, IDE-R). A device manager in Windows7 reports an error 10 or 12 with these

Re: [coreboot] does coreboot support kvm WPCE775x other questions

2014-01-06 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
On 05.01.2014 07:15, Gregg Levine wrote: Part of the problem with laptops is that there is a thing on them called an Embedded Controller, EC for short. Those devices do all of the housekeeping chores that the main system has delegated to them. For example certain functions are on it. To

[coreboot] Remove GENERATE_ACPI_TABLES

2014-01-06 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
By now most boards and OS don't run correctly if ACPI tables are not supplied. Ability by user to enable/disable their generation is just increasing configuration matrix for no benefit. So I propose to hardwire it to HAVE_ACPI_TABLES. I feel like in current config there are too many options of

Re: [coreboot] does coreboot support kvm WPCE775x other questions

2014-01-06 Thread David Hendricks
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 9:55 PM, dhan.war wardhan.v@gmail.com wrote: hi all i am using toshiba satellite c850d-m5010. the kvm is disabled by default in BIOS. it seems to me that many laptop manufacturers does not fully support kvm. my output of the superiotool : # superiotool

Re: [coreboot] Remove GENERATE_ACPI_TABLES

2014-01-06 Thread mrnuke
On Monday, January 06, 2014 07:52:20 PM Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: By now most boards and OS don't run correctly if ACPI tables are not supplied. Ability by user to enable/disable their generation is just increasing configuration matrix for no benefit. So I propose to

Re: [coreboot] Remove GENERATE_ACPI_TABLES

2014-01-06 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
On 07.01.2014 00:12, mrnuke wrote: On Monday, January 06, 2014 07:52:20 PM Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: By now most boards and OS don't run correctly if ACPI tables are not supplied. Ability by user to enable/disable their generation is just increasing configuration matrix

Re: [coreboot] Remove GENERATE_ACPI_TABLES

2014-01-06 Thread mr . nuke . me
On Tuesday, January 07, 2014 03:57:22 AM Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: You misunderstood. I don't propose to remove HAVE_ACPI_TABLES. HAVE_ACPI_TABLES remains per-board characteristic. The only thing I remove is GENERATE_ACPI_TABLES which is user-visible option. This way