On 23.03.2014 04:10, Peter Stuge wrote:
That isn't too different from creating a fork?
Fork is better. With fork we don't have to deal with the same people who
pushed the community out in the first place.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
coreboot mailing list:
On Sunday, March 23, 2014 07:34:32 AM Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
On 23.03.2014 04:10, Peter Stuge wrote:
That isn't too different from creating a fork?
Fork is better. With fork we don't have to deal with the same people who
pushed the community out in the first place.
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
The proposition of gatekeepers would essentially kill community effort.
That might not be a bad thing.
Unfortunately, considering how the hardware industry works, individual
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 03:56:35 -0600
David Hubbard david.c.hubbard+coreb...@gmail.com wrote:
Stefan appears to be missing in action.
No, well, he has stated that he want to wait till everybody has calmed
down (on IRC). It looks to me that he may have to wait indefinitely
though, and I would also
David Hubbard wrote:
Unfortunately, considering how the hardware industry works, individual
contributors in the community can't work on code for current hardware.
Peter, you make good points. As a purely community contributor I'd be happy
to sign any necessary NDAs to contribute on Google
David,
When you go out of line with a private email, expect to find yourself on
a public list.
Alex
On 03/23/2014 05:04 AM, David Hubbard wrote:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 1:26 AM, mrnuke mr.nuke...@gmail.com
mailto:mr.nuke...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, March 23, 2014 07:34:32 AM
Hello!
Please don't next time. Its considered to be rather rude, especially
if the sender asked you to keep it off the list. I don't pretend to
know what David H, was thinking, but I surmise he was indeed thinking
of that.
-
Gregg C Levine gregg.drw...@gmail.com
This signature fought the Time
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder'
Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23.03.2014 04:10, Peter Stuge wrote:
That isn't too different from creating a fork?
Fork is better. With fork we don't have to deal with the same people who
pushed the community out in the first
On Sunday, March 23, 2014 05:37:37 PM Peter Stuge wrote:
David Hubbard wrote:
But Peter, what's your take on Alex's suggestion: What do we need to
do to allow commercial contributors to work directly upstream? And
before you discount this question for menial technical reasons,
please take
On 23.03.2014 19:24, ron minnich wrote:
So I believe the problem is not the idea of gatekeepers, but the
manner in which they are proposed to work. Can you tell me what about
this upsets you? I want to understand.
The problem is that the proposal is that all commits go through
gatekeepers. It's
On 23.03.2014 19:24, ron minnich wrote:
I have friends who commit to grub2, and there seem to be gatekeepers
there; how do you manage that process?
In case of grub2 I admit we have exactly the problems I described. I'm
open to having more maintainers but right now it doesn't seem to be
feasible.
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
phco...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23.03.2014 19:24, ron minnich wrote:
So I believe the problem is not the idea of gatekeepers, but the
manner in which they are proposed to work. Can you tell me what about
this upsets you?
12 matches
Mail list logo
