Re: [coreboot] ASUS F2A85-M PRO

On 2015-03-03 19:42, David Englund wrote: Is this board supported? This is the only widely sold and popular board in the ASUS F2A85-M series. See http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENEDEPA=0Order=BESTMATCHDescription=F2A85-MN=-1isNodeId=1 for example. -- coreboot

Re: [coreboot] Long license headers (ANGER WARNING)

On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 6:10 AM Patrick Georgi via coreboot coreboot@coreboot.org wrote: 2015-03-04 14:58 GMT+01:00 Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se: I haven't gotten the impression that anyone is suggesting to remove or even change any copyright notices. Copyright documents authorship (like

Re: [coreboot] Long license headers (ANGER WARNING)

2015-03-04 18:32 GMT+01:00 ron minnich rminn...@gmail.com: Peter, per Patrick's note here, and discussions I've had with people who actually are real lawyers, who earn their money doing IP licensing, I think you are quite wrong. We should not change the license text in the files *unless it is

Re: [coreboot] Long license headers (ANGER WARNING)

http://review.coreboot.org/#/c/8602/ If this works I'll update the wiki. ron -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Re: [coreboot] [flashrom] New flashrom logo - please vote!

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 5:54 AM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net wrote: This is one of the reasons the lightning bolt of the old official logo looks the way it does. The following features had been chosen to avoid any unfortunate visual associations: - close in

Re: [coreboot] Long license headers (ANGER WARNING)

Section 1 of the GPLv2 contains: keep intact all the notices that refer to this License. Yes, but that only applies to verbatim copies. Section 2 explicitly allows you to distribute modified versions (and isn't incorporation into a larger code body always a modification?) as long as the whole is

Re: [coreboot] Long license headers (ANGER WARNING)

Does this count as common sense? http://review.coreboot.org/#/c/8602/ -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

[coreboot] coreboot GSoC 2015

coreboot has been accepted as a GSoC project . Woot! Please see the following announcement: http://blogs.coreboot.org/blog/2015/03/02/coreboot-gsoc-2015/ Interested students and mentors should visit the coreboot GSoC page: http://www.coreboot.org/GSoC Regards, Marc -- coreboot mailing list:

Re: [coreboot] [flashrom] New flashrom logo - colors

Thanks to everyone who has voted on the initial vote! It has helped me a lot already to rule out a number of variations. It also showed clearly that the old logo is not popular at all and that manual kerning is preferred to default letter spaces (I am using the FreeMono font, which is monospaced

Re: [coreboot] Long license headers (ANGER WARNING)

ron minnich wrote: IANAL (I'm not giving legal advice, yada yada), but I don't think that is how this works. Companies you don't work for can't force you to do X or prevent you to do Y with their files. Copyright statements are pretty complicated, and I am not sure you are right. I am

Re: [coreboot] Long license headers (ANGER WARNING)

2015-03-04 14:58 GMT+01:00 Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se: I haven't gotten the impression that anyone is suggesting to remove or even change any copyright notices. Copyright documents authorship (like git does too) but says nothing about licensing terms. Section 1 of the GPLv2 contains: keep