[coreboot] Calling all AMD K8 Opteron users!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 All, I am currently attempting to add a dual-package, dual core Socket F K8 Opteron system to the REACTS automated test system, however it appears that sometime around June / July this year the second CPU package on such systems stopped working.

[coreboot] coreboot binary policy

Hello coreboot, As presented and discussed in Bonn, the binary policy is up for review. http://review.coreboot.org/#/c/12198/ Please limit comments to specific items in this version. If you have additions for the next version (if needed), the draft document is open for comment.

[coreboot] Document for review: coreboot Gerrit Etiquette and Guidelines

As the community has grown, so has the need to formalize some of the guidelines that the community lives by. When the community was small, it was easy to communicate these things just from one person to another. Now, with more people joining the community every day, it seems that it's time to

Re: [coreboot] Asus M2N-E no boot, post codes A5 80 73

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Balázs Vinarz wrote: > Hi. > I compiled from the source about 6 months and now. The mobo is still > unable to boot. > Serial debugs are attached, i tried with many memory-modules in all > sockets. > There are two options, when the postcard

Re: [coreboot] Document for review: coreboot Gerrit Etiquette and Guidelines

On 10/29/2015 09:28 PM, ron minnich wrote: > It's a CL. Ooh, I thought it was a coreboot policy change that attempted to solve long-standing issues within coreboot. My bad. > It would be very helpful if you want to propose specific changes. I did. Refresh the page :) Alex -- coreboot mailing

Re: [coreboot] Document for review: coreboot Gerrit Etiquette and Guidelines

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:49 PM Alex G. wrote: > My bad. > > > Apology accepted. ron -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Re: [coreboot] Document for review: coreboot Gerrit Etiquette and Guidelines

Hi Martin, It seems that the first part of your document ("Summary", and "More detail") is written in direct response to the removal of FSP 1.0 a month or so ago. As such, it's very situation-centric, and fails to address some more fundamental issues. The concept of a "maintainer" is central to