Re: [coreboot] ASUS KGPE-D16 Automated Test Failure

2016-01-22 Thread Timothy Pearson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/22/2016 12:33 AM, Raptor Engineering Automated Coreboot Test Stand wrote: > The ASUS KGPE-D16 fails verification as of commit > e9995f1469504a61ba548f29fb16dc32cf9a3dea > > The following tests failed: > BOOT_FAILURE > > Commits since last

[coreboot] New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for coreboot

2016-01-22 Thread scan-admin
Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to coreboot found with Coverity Scan. 7 new defect(s) introduced to coreboot found with Coverity Scan. 1 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the recent build analyzed by Coverity Scan. New defect(s)

Re: [coreboot] [regression] Increased romstage boot time on ASRock E350M1 (AMD Family 14h)

2016-01-22 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear coreboot folks, Am Sonntag, den 10.01.2016, 13:40 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel: > on the ASRock E350M1, I lately noticed that the SeaBIOS banner takes > longer to appear. And looking at the logs board status [1], the time > stamps stored in CBMEM confirm this. > > ``` > $ grep 1st

Re: [coreboot] [RFC] Common license header guideline should prefer GPLv2+ over GPLv2 only

2016-01-22 Thread Alex G.
On 01/22/2016 08:21 AM, Patrick Georgi wrote: > I'm uneasy > with recommending that when not strictly necessary (I'd consider a > project that's based on "or later" licensing to be such a case). I'm not sure if you mean "something I'm uneasy about", or "an example I'd consider" when you say

[coreboot] ASUS KFSN4-DRE Automated Test Failure

2016-01-22 Thread Raptor Engineering Automated Coreboot Test Stand
The ASUS KFSN4-DRE fails verification as of commit 9cfb40adb72b34d55e8eee70f54152ca942810cf The following tests failed: DMESG_ACCESS_FAILURE ACPI_DSDT_ACCESS_FAILURE ACPI_SSDT_ACCESS_FAILURE Commits since last successful test: See attached log for details This message was automatically

Re: [coreboot] [RFC] Common license header guideline should prefer GPLv2+ over GPLv2 only

2016-01-22 Thread Patrick Georgi via coreboot
2016-01-22 17:01 GMT+01:00 Alex G. : > so that GPLv3 projects (e.g. SeaBIOS) may take code from coreboot where needed They don't even accept code under BSD type licenses. Patrick -- Google Germany GmbH, ABC-Str. 19, 20354 Hamburg Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB

Re: [coreboot] [RFC] Common license header guideline should prefer GPLv2+ over GPLv2 only

2016-01-22 Thread Patrick Georgi via coreboot
To add: 2016-01-22 17:01 GMT+01:00 Alex G. : > I think this would be a good move for interoperability, so that GPLv3 > projects (e.g. SeaBIOS) may take code from coreboot where needed (e.g. > device drivers). I'm strictly talking about listing the preferred > license; it's

[coreboot] [RFC] Common license header guideline should prefer GPLv2+ over GPLv2 only

2016-01-22 Thread Alex G.
I think this would be a good move for interoperability, so that GPLv3 projects (e.g. SeaBIOS) may take code from coreboot where needed (e.g. device drivers). I'm strictly talking about listing the preferred license; it's still up to contributors whether they want v2 or v2+. [1] Listed GPLv2+ as

Re: [coreboot] [RFC] Common license header guideline should prefer GPLv2+ over GPLv2 only

2016-01-22 Thread Patrick Georgi via coreboot
2016-01-22 17:25 GMT+01:00 Alex G. : > I'm not sure if you mean "something I'm uneasy about", or "an example > I'd consider" when you say "project that's based on 'or later'". u-boot > is v2+. Does that count? I'd recommend u-boot to standardize on a v2+ template, yes. (not