[coreboot] New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for coreboot

Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to coreboot found with Coverity Scan. 19 new defect(s) introduced to coreboot found with Coverity Scan. 32 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the recent build analyzed by Coverity Scan. New

Re: [coreboot] It appears the build process still uses unverified http wget sources

On 06.11.2016 23:30, taii...@gmx.com wrote: > I suppose you are correct, but would you have rather I didn't mention it? No, but you could have chosen kindlier words. > > I would love to, however I do not have the scripting skills required to > ensure proper verification and unfortunately there

Re: [coreboot] It appears the build process still uses unverified http wget sources

I suppose you are correct, but would you have rather I didn't mention it? I would love to, however I do not have the scripting skills required to ensure proper verification and unfortunately there are multiple dependencies that don't publish gpg signatures. It isn't an easy task if we want

Re: [coreboot] It appears the build process still uses unverified http wget sources

On 06.11.2016 22:44, taii...@gmx.com wrote: > It is 2016 not 2001 and MITM's are a regular thing so this is a serious > issue. Yes, YOU haven't fixed that yet. -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

[coreboot] It appears the build process still uses unverified http wget sources

It is 2016 not 2001 and MITM's are a regular thing so this is a serious issue. -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Re: [coreboot] radare

Hello Riko, I recently also became very interested to start using radare2 (Raphael Machado's dissasembly attempts got involved me, to set the tool). Since I am very lazy person, the first was to ask my Fedora 25 distro does the distro have package radare2? Yes, it does have it, so I have

Re: [coreboot] Fund a TALOS Secure Workstation as coreboot build system

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Martin Roth wrote: > Is getting a Talos workstation as a build server something that people are > interested in contributing money for? > Yes, this needs to happen. > So far, we've got $2500 pledged from two contributors out of the $7500 >

Re: [coreboot] Removing Intel ME from the X230 coreboot

On 11/06/2016 10:11 AM, Charlotte Plusplus wrote: > Hello > > Did you release any of your work to remove the ME for a X230? > > I am interested in attempting that on a W520. On > https://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/2016-September/082049.html > you mention you left ROMP, BUP, KERNEL, POLICY

Re: [coreboot] Patch: support for the Lenovo Thinkpad W520

On 06.11.2016 15:21, Kyösti Mälkki wrote: > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Charlotte Plusplus < > pluspluscharlo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello >> >> Also, can I please ask for some help on USBDEBUG? I have a FT232R >> cable and enabled CONFIG_USBDEBUG_DONGLE_FTDI_FT232H. But I receive >>

Re: [coreboot] Patch: support for the Lenovo Thinkpad W520

Hi, On 06.11.2016 11:25, Patrick Rudolph wrote: > Am 06.11.2016 um 09:33 schrieb Charlotte Plusplus: >> Also, in romstage I am not sure of : >> /* Disable unused devices (board specific) */ >> RCBA32(FD) = 0x1ee51fe3; > You can dump the value stock lenovo bios sets at boot using

Re: [coreboot] More experiments with disabling the ME

To Whom It May Concern! I sincerely hope that Google designers, reading this thread, and are involved in the R of multi-core silicon ARM server, with Coreboot designers, will NOT replicate/copy such an opaque design as INTEL did (and why, really???), and they'll get rid of ME entity

Re: [coreboot] Patch: support for the Lenovo Thinkpad W520

On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Charlotte Plusplus < pluspluscharlo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello > > Also, can I please ask for some help on USBDEBUG? I have a FT232R > cable and enabled CONFIG_USBDEBUG_DONGLE_FTDI_FT232H. But I receive > nothing. Is it necessary to have a FT232H? I looked at

[coreboot] Need advice on modifying mainboard dsdt file

Hi, I've just dumped a stock ACPI DSDT table of a Lenovo ThinkPad. I need to update the device section of the machine. Currently the acpi/superio.asl file of the mainboard is a line ``#include ``, in which I hope to modify a device section to add the mouse hardware ID to it instead of using the

Re: [coreboot] Patch: support for the Lenovo Thinkpad W520

Hello Charlotte, thanks for adding support for W520. Am 06.11.2016 um 09:33 schrieb Charlotte Plusplus: Hello I am new to coreboot. I tried to run coreboot on my Thinkpad W520 to replace my Sandy Bridge CPU by a Ivy Bridge CPU, since several people reported it worked very well. Following

[coreboot] Patch: support for the Lenovo Thinkpad W520

Hello I am new to coreboot. I tried to run coreboot on my Thinkpad W520 to replace my Sandy Bridge CPU by a Ivy Bridge CPU, since several people reported it worked very well. Following their suggestions, I simply tried to flash a T520 image to save time. It didn't work at all. I was very angry I

[coreboot] Removing Intel ME from the X230 coreboot

Hello Did you release any of your work to remove the ME for a X230? I am interested in attempting that on a W520. On https://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/2016-September/082049.html you mention you left ROMP, BUP, KERNEL, POLICY and FTCS. Any update on that? Is it the minimal set?? I