[coreboot] Yet another gerrit update (2.14.1)

Hi everybody, I just updated our gerrit instance, which should fix a number of performance related regressions. Since there were requests for supporting ecdsa and ed25519 keys in gerrit's ssh interface, I also want to point out that 2.14 brought support for them. I didn't mention it because it

Re: [coreboot] riscv: How to debug (王翔)

On Friday,June 9, 2017 at 12:34 PM,王翔 wrote: >On Friday,June 9, 2017 9:17 AM, Jonathan Neuschäfer wrote: >>On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 05:32:31PM +0800, 王翔 wrote: >>> I try to debug coreboot with **spike**. >>> I has apply the **8250 usart patch** to **spike**. >>I haven't updated the patches at

Re: [coreboot] riscv: How to debug (王翔)

On Friday,June 9, 2017 9:17 AM, Jonathan Neuschäfer wrote: >On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 05:32:31PM +0800, 王翔 wrote: >> I try to debug coreboot with **spike**. >> I has apply the **8250 usart patch** to **spike**. >I haven't updated the patches at [1] in a while. Please check if the two >patches in

Re: [coreboot] riscv: How to debug

On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 05:32:31PM +0800, 王翔 wrote: > I try to debug coreboot with **spike**. > I has apply the **8250 usart patch** to **spike**. I haven't updated the patches at [1] in a while. Please check if the two patches in [2] work for you if you also apply the following patch to

Re: [coreboot] AMD EPYC and PSP

Here's the direct download link without registering (hate to give springer any information): https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-1-4302-6572-6.pdf On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Peter Stuge wrote: > ron minnich wrote: > > Ah gee Peter, thanks for making me look

[coreboot] and here we go again!

"Microsoft's security team has come across a malware family that uses Intel's Active Management Technology (AMT) Serial-over-LAN (SOL) interface as a file transfer tool. The

Re: [coreboot] AMD EPYC and PSP

ron minnich wrote: > Ah gee Peter, thanks for making me look at a web page with this sentence: > "Safeguarding the Future of Computing with Intel Embedded Security and > Management Engine" > > My irony-meter immediately went to 11 ... million. Ha! :) I can really recommend eyeing through that

Re: [coreboot] AMD EPYC and PSP

Ah gee Peter, thanks for making me look at a web page with this sentence: "Safeguarding the Future of Computing with Intel Embedded Security and Management Engine" My irony-meter immediately went to 11 ... million. On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:43 PM Peter Stuge wrote: > Rene

Re: [coreboot] AMD EPYC and PSP

Rene Shuster wrote: > Not an expert obviously, but I was under the impression the Digital > Restriction Management was achieved through Widevine. No? DRM requires hardware support to be useful. If the Widevine software component was solely responsible for DRM then another software component

[coreboot] coreboot community meeting minutes for June 8, 2017

These are the minutes from yesterday's coreboot community meeting. Information about the next meeting is at the bottom. Today's meeting was very short again, with not much news due to a focus on the Denver conference for the past couple of weeks. We had a total of 7 people attending.

Re: [coreboot] AMD EPYC and PSP

Not an expert obviously, but I was under the impression the Digital Restriction Management was achieved through Widevine. No? On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Patrick Georgi wrote: > Since these discussions flare up time and time again (without ever being > resolved in any

Re: [coreboot] AMD EPYC and PSP

Since these discussions flare up time and time again (without ever being resolved in any productive way because the discussion happens in the wrong forum [0]): Netflix et al are (probably) required by their contracts with the content providers (producers, distributors) to make it reasonably hard

Re: [coreboot] AMD EPYC and PSP

Nico, Would you mind to elaborate and enlighten us on this matter? On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Nico Huber wrote: > On 08.06.2017 16:48, Johnysecured88 via coreboot wrote: > > Does anyone anticipate the new EPYC cpus not having PSP? > > Well, I don't. The answer is quite

Re: [coreboot] AMD EPYC and PSP

On 08.06.2017 16:48, Johnysecured88 via coreboot wrote: > Does anyone anticipate the new EPYC cpus not having PSP? Well, I don't. The answer is quite simple if you ask the question differently: Do you expect AMD to drop Netflix support? Nico -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot + Seabios Asus F2A85-M LE card

https://www.coreboot.org/VGA_support On 17-06-08 11:01:55, Gabriel Bosque wrote: > Internal. Where do I find firmware for it? > > Tanks in advance > > 2017-06-08 10:45 GMT-03:00 Piotr Kubaj : > > > Do you use the internal GPU or external? If you use internal, you probably >

[coreboot] AMD EPYC and PSP

Does anyone anticipate the new EPYC cpus not having PSP? Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.-- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot + Seabios Asus F2A85-M LE card

Internal. Where do I find firmware for it? Tanks in advance 2017-06-08 10:45 GMT-03:00 Piotr Kubaj : > Do you use the internal GPU or external? If you use internal, you probably > need firmware from AMD (SeaVGABIOS won't work). If you have external GPU, > you don't need VGA

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot + Seabios Asus F2A85-M LE card

Do you use the internal GPU or external? If you use internal, you probably need firmware from AMD (SeaVGABIOS won't work). If you have external GPU, you don't need VGA option ROM at all. Anyway, you don't need SeaVGABIOS. You also put CONFIG_QEMU_HARDWARE=y, which is unnecessary.

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot + Seabios Asus F2A85-M LE card

I forgot the .configs... 2017-06-08 8:21 GMT-03:00 Gabriel Bosque : > Thanks for the feedback! > I imagine I just need to put the vbios file if the video card is not > default ... anyway could you suggest a file for me to test? (For this > motherboard model) > >

[coreboot] ASUS KFSN4-DRE Automated Test Failure [master]

The ASUS KFSN4-DRE fails verification for branch master as of commit 2e7f6ccafc3e633ed9001b3c3863253ee0630429 The following tests failed: VIDEO_FAILURE Commits since last successful test: 2e7f6cc fsp/gop: Add running the GOP to the choice of gfx init d4ebeaf device/Kconfig: Put gfx init methods

Re: [coreboot] APTIO

I'll prefer text-based over GUI due to the faster way of navigating through the menus, but then I saw the mouse pointer on the screenshots​... Worst is when the defacto standard of text-based navigation with TAB / SHIFT+TAB / arrow keys / SPACE (select) is implemented sloppy (or not working at all

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot + Seabios Asus F2A85-M LE card

Thanks for the feedback! I imagine I just need to put the vbios file if the video card is not default ... anyway could you suggest a file for me to test? (For this motherboard model) 2017-06-08 0:01 GMT-03:00 Rafael Machado : > Hi Gabriel. > Since you are

Re: [coreboot] make crossgcc-i386 : ubsan.c error (with fix!) for GCC

On Sun, 2017-06-04 at 22:49 +, qma ster wrote: > Good day! While building the coreboot's toolchain by using GCC 7.1.1 > version, I am getting the following error: > > ubsan.c:1474:23: error: ISO C++ forbids comparison between pointer and > integer [-fpermissive] >|| xloc.file == '\0'

Re: [coreboot] GRUB boot menu is not showing GRUB2

Ok.. Fine Thank you very much...Mariusz, Zoran and Nico. On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Nico Huber wrote: > On 07.06.2017 17:34, Dhanasekar Jaganathan wrote: > > Hi Nico, > > > > I have taken the Flash Region's dump of my vendor BIOS using Ifdtool > (which > > is

[coreboot] riscv: How to debug

I try to debug coreboot with **spike**. I has apply the **8250 usart patch** to **spike**. But I get from the official website of the code can not pass the test. I found some BUG when I debug this. I want to submit the code but I can't test it. What can i do, who can help me. I get code from

Re: [coreboot] GRUB boot menu is not showing GRUB2

On 07.06.2017 17:34, Dhanasekar Jaganathan wrote: > Hi Nico, > > I have taken the Flash Region's dump of my vendor BIOS using Ifdtool (which > is copied below), > > *FLREG0:0x000f* > * Flash Region 0 (Flash Descriptor): - * > *FLREG1:0x07ff0200* > * Flash Region 1

Re: [coreboot] GRUB boot menu is not showing GRUB2

> After adding menu entry for fedora OS, I can able to see *boot menu successfully*.. . Case closed. Kudos to Mariusz. Zoran out On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 7:09 AM, Dhanasekar Jaganathan < jdhanasekar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Mariusz / Zoran, > > After adding the below lines only in grub.cfg