Email coreboot@coreboot.org was removed.
https://ticket.coreboot.org/my/account
User: flx
IP address: 185.104.142.213
Date: 04/12/2022 12:55 AM
--
You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it,
or are involved in it.
To change your notification preferences,
Arthur Heymans wrote:
> I think this issue might affect a lot more systems than I initially thought.
Would it make sense to backport your fix to old releases and bump
those release numbers to a .1 on the end?
//Peter
___
coreboot mailing list --
Martin Roth via coreboot wrote:
> 1) Please don't use the term deprecate - use "moved to a branch"
I don't think the wording matters, my points are discoverability and
drive-by maintainance.
> If a platform is perfect and doesn't need to be updated, it doesn't
> need to be on the master
Martin Roth via coreboot wrote:
> > Your concern is valid and I think a key point. CBOR may not be bad
> > over a socket, but such a complex and arbitrarily extensible format
> > is much too error prone to be a good technical choice during boot.
>
> So if the idea is to create a payload handoff
arthur, what might we do with either the build process or startup to
avoid this problem in future? Do you think we could find a way to
catch this programmatically soon, rather than humanly too late?
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 2:48 AM Arthur Heymans wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> After last week's SMM loader
Hi
After last week's SMM loader problem on all but the BSP, I noticed another
problem in the SMM setup.
The permanent smihandler is currently built as a relocatable module such
that coreboot
can place it wherever it thinks it's a good idea. (TSEG is not known at
buildtime).
These relocatable
6 matches
Mail list logo