Re: [coreboot] $7 cheap FT232H board as EHCI debug dongle for coreboot - would it work?

On 03/05/2018 11:36 AM, Kyösti Mälkki wrote: > Not likely those PCBs have gone through much testing on assembly line, > how about 4... Have a couple of these: and none of them failed me thus far. Also using them successfully for Coreboot early debugging,

Re: [coreboot] Broadwell IGD (on Auron_Paine)

On 10/19/2015 09:15 PM, Stefan Reinauer wrote: > it seems that the refcode binary was not running. Can you verify that > it was part of the image and gets executed? Of course, good find. The reference code blob was actually in the CBFS but unfortunately the code to run it was disabled if no such

Re: [coreboot] Broadwell IGD (on Auron_Paine)

On 10/23/2015 02:44 PM, Georg Wicherski wrote: > There is one remaining issue, when using GRUB2 as payload and using the > at_keyboard terminal_input, the machine resets. The last debug print I > can see from GRUB2 is from term/at_keyboard.c:367 with current_set=0, so > I suppose

[coreboot] Broadwell IGD (on Auron_Paine)

Hi, thanks to Marc Jones' SGD patch for the Auron board (f3214d02482a4104d7276f06d6b326b2a54c4262), I was able to get my Auron_Paine up to ramstage. Unfortunately, the IGD code in soc/intel/broadwell/ appears to be somewhat broken. Based off Aaron's guidance on IRC, I've pin-pointed the issue to