Re: [coreboot] Patching Config.lb

On 25/01/08 10:39 -0700, Myles Watson wrote: Jordan, What benefit do we get from patching Config.lb instead of just copying a new one into the directory? It seems like the same thing, only the complete Config.lb would be more human readable. I just thought that as long as you are

Re: [coreboot] Patching Config.lb

On Jan 25, 2008 10:07 AM, Peter Stuge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We were discussing an overlay config - that is applied after the current Config.lb if specified in an environment variable. Is that still interesting? Would it solve the problem? I think that's a quick hack, I could take a look.

Re: [coreboot] Patching Config.lb

On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:44:38AM -0700, Jordan Crouse wrote: I agree with all of this. We should switch to complete Config.lbs for v2. Also, the reason why I haven't submitted my patch is that buildtarget is still broken for -fno-stack-protector (as per a previous email), and I figured