On 5/15/19 11:54 PM, Nico Huber wrote:
If you can't provide any _related_ reference for research on AMD
processors, please keep your believes about who is better for
yourself (or at least away from technical oriented mailing lists).
Nico, you sound a little rude and schoolmasterly.
You know,
Hi
On 15. 05. 19 17:28, Nico Huber wrote:
Hi Ivan,
I'm curious. Did you do or know somebody who did as much research on AMD
processors, as was necessary to find these vulnerabilities? If not, how
can you make such comparisons?
Here [1] is a official AMD paper on the speculation behavior in
On 15.05.19 17:59, Ivan Ivanov wrote:
> Yes, the people are checking AMD as well, and discovered the
> AMD-specific vulnerabilities at their PSP Platform (IN)Security
> Processor.
Unless I missed something about the PSP, I fear, we are talking
past each other. Not only is the PSP a completely
Yes, the people are checking AMD as well, and discovered the
AMD-specific vulnerabilities at their PSP Platform (IN)Security
Processor. Luckily almost all the coreboot-supported AMD computers -
with the exception of some PC Engines boards if I'm not mistaken -
don't have a PSP, so not affected.
On 15.05.19 17:37, Ivan Ivanov wrote:
> Hi Nico, when someone finds a vulnerability at Intel, people do a good
> digging for a similar vulnerability at AMD.
I don't doubt it. But did somebody try to find AMD-specific vulnera-
bilities? Checking if somebody else did the same errors is not the same
Hi Nico, when someone finds a vulnerability at Intel, people do a good
digging for a similar vulnerability at AMD. And so far, if I haven't
missed something, it has been discovered that AMD shares only a few
variants of Spectre together with Intel, while all the other vulns
seem to be
6 matches
Mail list logo
