Re: [coreboot] FYI: ACPI ASL 2.0

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 1:02 PM Duncan Laurie wrote: > So far I've been asking people in ACPI patches to not introduce ASL 2.0 > syntax into existing ASL code as it can be confusing if the two are mixed. > So we should either convert everything or at least only use ASL 2.0

Re: [coreboot] FYI: ACPI ASL 2.0

I've even seen this done, or maybe I did it, I forget, but it's a one time pass through something like cpp: #define Store(src, dst) dst = src to produce the final output. repeat for all ops of interest. Then, if there is a switch to ASL to not accept pre-asl-2.0 code you do a clean up stage as

Re: [coreboot] FYI: ACPI ASL 2.0

So far I've been asking people in ACPI patches to not introduce ASL 2.0 syntax into existing ASL code as it can be confusing if the two are mixed. So we should either convert everything or at least only use ASL 2.0 syntax in new files. The problem with auto-converting sources with the

[coreboot] FYI: ACPI ASL 2.0

Hi all, Just FYI [1], maybe you already know. There is an alternate syntax available for ACPI ASL sources. It just converts Polish notation of ASL to something less geeky like C operators. It says that the tool to convert the sources is in development (to ratain comments). I think it would make