On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 3:19 AM Jonathan Neuschäfer
wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:46:54AM +0800, 王翔 wrote:
> [...]
> > Is coreboot's payload a bootloader running in m-mode ?
> > If not, how does the SBI interrupt service be implemented ?
>
> Previously, coreboot implemented the SBI, and lau
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:46:54AM +0800, 王翔 wrote:
[...]
> Is coreboot's payload a bootloader running in m-mode ?
> If not, how does the SBI interrupt service be implemented ?
Previously, coreboot implemented the SBI, and launched the payload in
S-mode. The SBI implementation implemented the old
> In short: Because it was easier to delay the problem until later.
>
>On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 03:55:37PM +0800, 王翔 wrote:
>> The current code does not set the stack pointer for hart alone.
>> The Linux kernel runs in s-mode and cannot set the stack pointer for m-mode.
>> If m-mode does not have a
In short: Because it was easier to delay the problem until later.
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 03:55:37PM +0800, 王翔 wrote:
> The current code does not set the stack pointer for hart alone.
> The Linux kernel runs in s-mode and cannot set the stack pointer for m-mode.
> If m-mode does not have a separat
4 matches
Mail list logo