Andreas Schwab wrote:
Eric Blake eblake-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+a...@public.gmane.org writes:
* src/stat.c (epoch_time): New function.
(print_stat): Use it for %[WXYZ].
* NEWS: Document this.
* tests/touch/60-seconds: Adjust test to match.
---
It bugs me that %x has more information than %X in
Jim Meyering j...@meyering.net writes:
Can you point to any others?
Tramp, mkinitrd on openSUSE 11.3.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
And now for something completely different.
Andreas Schwab wrote:
Jim Meyering j...@meyering.net writes:
Can you point to any others?
Tramp, mkinitrd on openSUSE 11.3.
I found one, you mention two more. IMHO, that's not too bad.
And besides, with coreutils-8.6 already released, reverting the
change is no longer an option.
Jim Meyering j...@meyering.net writes:
And besides, with coreutils-8.6 already released, reverting the
change is no longer an option.
Why? I'm pretty sure more breakage will pop up over time.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756
On 10/21/2010 03:22 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Jim Meyeringj...@meyering.net writes:
And besides, with coreutils-8.6 already released, reverting the
change is no longer an option.
Why? I'm pretty sure more breakage will pop up over time.
How would you propose 'fixing' it? By burning
Andreas Schwab wrote:
Jim Meyering j...@meyering.net writes:
And besides, with coreutils-8.6 already released, reverting the
change is no longer an option.
Why? I'm pretty sure more breakage will pop up over time.
Hmm... I see what you mean.
Anyone using a distribution with coreutils-8.5
On 10/21/2010 08:09 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Eric Blakeebl...@redhat.com writes:
On 10/21/2010 03:22 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Jim Meyeringj...@meyering.net writes:
And besides, with coreutils-8.6 already released, reverting the
change is no longer an option.
Why? I'm pretty sure
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com writes:
On 10/21/2010 03:22 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Jim Meyeringj...@meyering.net writes:
And besides, with coreutils-8.6 already released, reverting the
change is no longer an option.
Why? I'm pretty sure more breakage will pop up over time.
How would
On 21/10/10 15:01, Jim Meyering wrote:
Andreas Schwab wrote:
Jim Meyering j...@meyering.net writes:
And besides, with coreutils-8.6 already released, reverting the
change is no longer an option.
Why? I'm pretty sure more breakage will pop up over time.
Hmm... I see what you mean.
On 21/10/10 15:18, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 21/10/10 15:01, Jim Meyering wrote:
Andreas Schwab wrote:
Jim Meyering j...@meyering.net writes:
And besides, with coreutils-8.6 already released, reverting the
change is no longer an option.
Why? I'm pretty sure more breakage will pop up over
On 21/10/10 15:49, Eric Blake wrote:
On 10/21/2010 08:42 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
Or use '.' rather than ':' which also has the
advantage of being backward compat with older stats,
To clarify, coreutils= 8.5 output these timestamps
using an int format internally, and so ignored any specified
Eric Blake wrote:
On 10/21/2010 09:33 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Then, to get full seconds.nanoseconds, you'd use a format like %X.%:X
and if you want only milliseconds, you'd use %X.%3.3:X
Oops.
I forgot to zero-pad. Otherwise, with 100,000,000ns in the first
case or 100 in the 2nd, and
Jim Meyering wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
Eric Blake wrote:
On 10/21/2010 08:09 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Eric Blakeebl...@redhat.com writes:
On 10/21/2010 03:22 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Jim Meyeringj...@meyering.net writes:
And besides, with coreutils-8.6 already released,
Hi,
I think I've found three typos in the date program. I've attached a
patch correcting those.
Regards,
Tobias
--
Tobias Quathamer | A nuclear war can ruin your whole day.
Hamburg, Germany |
From 8e3f4d4ac0d8e647bdbb47a85e245cc48b873220 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tobias Quathamer
14 matches
Mail list logo
