Eric Blake wrote:
On 10/01/2010 04:34 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 10/01/2010 09:19 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
Correct - time_t need not be integral, but do we have any proof of a
system using a floating-point time_t?
I think I'm going to write a POSIX bug requesting that time_t be
tightened to
Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 01/10/10 00:32, Eric Blake wrote:
* src/stat.c (epoch_time): New function.
(print_stat): Use it for %[WXYZ].
* NEWS: Document this.
* tests/touch/60-seconds: Adjust test to match.
---
It bugs me that %x has more information than %X in 'stat --format',
especially,
* src/stat.c (epoch_time): New function.
(print_stat): Use it for %[WXYZ].
* NEWS: Document this.
* tests/touch/60-seconds: Adjust test to match.
---
It bugs me that %x has more information than %X in 'stat --format',
especially, since we don't support any format modifiers for getting
at the
On 01/10/10 00:32, Eric Blake wrote:
* src/stat.c (epoch_time): New function.
(print_stat): Use it for %[WXYZ].
* NEWS: Document this.
* tests/touch/60-seconds: Adjust test to match.
---
It bugs me that %x has more information than %X in 'stat --format',
especially, since we don't support
