On 3/24/22 10:26 AM, Fariya F wrote:
> Thank you for all the inputs.
>
> I have a question what is the meaning of overhead block (its different from
> reserved block) and how the number of overhead blocks is calculated?
Not really a df/coreutils question. The command fetches info from the
Thank you for all the inputs.
I have a question what is the meaning of overhead block (its different from
reserved block) and how the number of overhead blocks is calculated? The
problem is the num of overhead blocks are more than the total blocks for
that partition and that's why the total
On 3/22/22 11:50 AM, Fariya F wrote:
>
>
> This is a 32 bit hardware. This partition has private data in here.
Wild guess: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/fe23cb65c2c3
Rob
Fariya F wrote:
> Yes it is an embedded system. The package we have used is coreutils 8.25
> and not 1.35. Very sorry for the confusion.
Ah! No worries. :-)
Then I will ask if my assumption about /dev/mmcblk2 being an SD card
is incorrect? Is it actually soldered on flash NAND? In which case
Yes it is an embedded system. The package we have used is coreutils 8.25
and not 1.35. Very sorry for the confusion.
On Tue, 22 Mar, 2022, 10:43 pm Bob Proulx, wrote:
> Rob Landley wrote:
> > Fariya F wrote:
> > > The version of df command is 1.85.
>
> A current version of Coreutils df by most
Rob Landley wrote:
> Fariya F wrote:
> > The version of df command is 1.85.
A current version of Coreutils df by most distros would be 8.x and the
upstream stable version is version 9. This leads me to believe that
the df you are using is not from Coreutils but from somewhere else.
But not
This is a 32 bit hardware. This partition has private data in here.
Regards
Fariya
On Tue, 22 Mar, 2022, 8:48 pm Rob Landley, wrote:
> On 3/22/22 9:12 AM, Fariya F wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The version of df command is 1.85.
> > Kernel version 4.9.31
>
> A 2016 release, plus bugfixes.
>
> $ git
On 3/22/22 9:12 AM, Fariya F wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The version of df command is 1.85.
> Kernel version 4.9.31
A 2016 release, plus bugfixes.
$ git log --no-merges v4.9..master fs/ext4 | grep ^commit | wc -l
1213
Bit of water under that bridge in the past 8 years.
> The fsck check on that partition
Hi,
The version of df command is 1.85.
Kernel version 4.9.31
The fsck check on that partition succeeds. I am able to use the partition,
create files etc. However df reports incorrectly the size and used
percentage.
Output from strace command is as follows;
statfs64("/data", 88,
Fariya F wrote:
> My eMMC device has a partition which reports the below output from df -h
> command:
>
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/mmcblk2p316Z 16Z 84M 100% /data
Since the df command is simply reporting back on what the Linux kernel
reports, and the kernel
10 matches
Mail list logo
