No test failures on
CentOS 8
CentOS 7.8
CentOS 6.9
FreeBSD 13.0
OpenBSD 7.0
On NetBSD 9.0, there are 5 test failures:
FAIL: tests/misc/date-debug
===
--- exp22022-04-09 21:55:43.269998664 +0200
+++ out22022-04-09 21:55:43.307499055 +0200
@@ -5,9 +5,8 @@
date: error: invalid date/time value:
date: user provided time:
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> > FAIL: tests/cp/sparse-perf
>
> What file system is this?
It's an ext4 (rw,relatime,seclabel,data=ordered).
Filesystem features: has_journal ext_attr resize_inode dir_index filetype
needs_recovery extent 64bit flex_bg sparse_super large_file huge_file uninit_bg
On Solaris 11.4 (x86_64, in 64-bit mode), there are 4 test failures:
FAIL: tests/misc/stty-row-col
=
++ initial_cwd_=/export/home/bruno/coreutils-9.0.193-54bec/build-64
+++ testdir_prefix_
+++ printf gt
++ pfx_=gt
+++ mktempd_
On 10/04/2022 14:23, Bruno Haible wrote:
On Guix 1.1 (x86_64): No test failures, but 1 test in is ERROR.
ERROR: tests/misc/stty
==
+ stty_reversible_init_
++ tr '\n' ' '
++ perl -lne '/^ *{"(.*?)",.*\bREV\b/ and print $1'
On Solaris 11 OpenIndiana in 64-bit mode, there are 3 test failures.
FAIL: tests/misc/dircolors
==
dircolors.pl: test term-1: stdout mismatch, comparing term-1.2 (expected) and
term-1.O (actual)
*** term-1.2Sun Apr 10 17:58:03 2022
--- term-1.OSun Apr 10
On Alpine Linux 3.14 (x86_64), 3 tests fail:
FAIL: tests/cp/sparse-perf
==
+ initial_cwd_=/home/bruno/coreutils-9.0.193-54bec/build-64
+ testdir_prefix_
+ printf gt
+ pfx_=gt
+ mktempd_ /home/bruno/coreutils-9.0.193-54bec/build-64 gt-sparse-perf.sh.
+
On Guix 1.1 (x86_64): No test failures, but 1 test in is ERROR.
ERROR: tests/misc/stty
==
++ initial_cwd_=/home/guest/coreutils-9.0.193-54bec/build-64
+++ testdir_prefix_
+++ printf gt
++ pfx_=gt
+++ mktempd_ /home/guest/coreutils-9.0.193-54bec/build-64 gt-stty.sh.
+++
In coreutils 9.0:
$ /usr/bin/printf "%a\n" 0x1.1p-20
0x8.8p-23
$ c_printf 0x1.1p-20 # printf("%a\n", strtod(argv[1], NULL));
0x1.1p-20
Imo, this normalization inconsistency is worth addressing. What do you think?
There's nothing
On CentOS 7.3.1611 there is 1 test failure:
FAIL: tests/cp/sparse-perf
==
++ initial_cwd_=/home/bruno/coreutils-9.0.193-54bec/build-64
+++ testdir_prefix_
+++ printf gt
++ pfx_=gt
+++ mktempd_ /home/bruno/coreutils-9.0.193-54bec/build-64 gt-sparse-perf.sh.
+++ case
On 10/04/2022 12:19, Bruno Haible wrote:
On CentOS 7.3.1611 there is 1 test failure:
FAIL: tests/cp/sparse-perf
+ timeout 10 truncate -s1T f
+ seek_data_capable_ f > + timeout 10 python
/home/bruno/coreutils-9.0.193-54bec/build-64/../tests/seek-data-capable f
+ timeout 10 cp
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> The attached should do that.
Yes, it does. Thanks.
Bruno
On 10/04/2022 15:37, Bruno Haible wrote:
On Solaris 11.4 (x86_64, in 64-bit mode), there are 4 test failures:
FAIL: tests/misc/stty-row-col
=
Any of the commands like `stty rows 40 columns 80` are being silently ignored.
FWIW on the Solaris 10 system I've access
On Cygwin 2.9.0 (x86_64) there are 35 failures:
FAIL: tests/tail-2/inotify-race
FAIL: tests/tail-2/inotify-race2
FAIL: tests/rm/cycle
FAIL: tests/chmod/no-x
FAIL: tests/rm/fail-eacces
FAIL: tests/rm/inaccessible
FAIL: tests/rm/rm1
FAIL: tests/rm/rm2
FAIL: tests/chgrp/no-x
FAIL: tests/misc/env
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> > FAIL: tests/misc/dircolors
> > ==
> >
> > dircolors.pl: test term-1: stdout mismatch, comparing term-1.2 (expected)
> > and term-1.O (actual)
> > *** term-1.2Sun Apr 10 17:58:03 2022
> > --- term-1.OSun Apr 10 17:58:03 2022
> >
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> > FAIL: tests/misc/stty-row-col
> > =
>
> Any of the commands like `stty rows 40 columns 80` are being silently ignored.
> FWIW on the Solaris 10 system I've access to, this test passes.
> I'd need access to investigate.
I'm sorry, the license
16 matches
Mail list logo
