Hi,
I have submitted the patch long time ago as I was asked to add the
patch. However, nobody really takes a look at it. I feel really sad.
Could anybody take a look and see if it is above the quality criterion
and let me know what I need to change so this small utility can be
added to the
As a replacement for my previously proposed patch:
[PATCH] tests: adjust PATH to include /usr/sbin for filefrag-using tests
(see http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2011-11/msg00086.html),
and after some confusion in the discussion, the following patch adds
/sbin and /usr/sbin generally
On 12/01/2011 12:17 AM, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
As a replacement for my previously proposed patch:
[PATCH] tests: adjust PATH to include /usr/sbin for filefrag-using tests
(see http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2011-11/msg00086.html),
and after some confusion in the discussion, the
On 11/30/2011 06:43 PM, Peng Yu wrote:
Hi,
I have submitted the patch long time ago as I was asked to add the
patch. However, nobody really takes a look at it. I feel really sad.
Could anybody take a look and see if it is above the quality criterion
and let me know what I need to change so
sorry, I forgot to CC the list, so here it is again ...
On 12/01/2011 01:40 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 12/01/2011 12:17 AM, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
As a replacement for my previously proposed patch:
[PATCH] tests: adjust PATH to include /usr/sbin for filefrag-using tests
(see
Bernhard Voelker wrote:
On 12/01/2011 01:40 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 12/01/2011 12:17 AM, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
As a replacement for my previously proposed patch:
[PATCH] tests: adjust PATH to include /usr/sbin for filefrag-using tests
(see
Paul Eggert egg...@cs.ucla.edu writes:
My read of the situation is that the filesystem guys have
spent a lot of time optimizing ordinary write but they
haven't gotten around to optimizing fallocate because it's
so rarely used -- which means that if one uses fallocate
one gets lousy
