re-adding the list.
On 12/07/2012 07:43 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 12/07/2012 06:28 PM, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
>> On 12/05/2012 09:37 AM, Ondrej Oprala wrote:
>>> On 12/05/2012 02:28 AM, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
Ondrej (and others): WDYT?
>>> Looks good to me :) .
>>
>> Shall I push?
>
>
On 12/07/2012 03:07 PM, Assaf Gordon wrote:
Thank you for your feedback.
I'm working on fixing those issues.
Some comments/questions:
Pádraig Brady wrote, On 12/06/2012 06:59 PM:
I noticed This command will core dump:
$ /bin/ls -l | src/numfmt --to-unit=1 --field=5
so I'm thinking `numfmt` s
Thank you for your feedback.
I'm working on fixing those issues.
Some comments/questions:
Pádraig Brady wrote, On 12/06/2012 06:59 PM:
> I noticed This command will core dump:
> $ /bin/ls -l | src/numfmt --to-unit=1 --field=5
>
> so I'm thinking `numfmt` should support --header too.
>
I'll add
On 12/07/2012 11:06 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 12/07/2012 08:25 AM, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
>> Therefore this is my first test:
>>
>>$ echo 11505426432 | src/numfmt
>>11505426432
>>
>> Hmm, shouldn't it converting that to a human-readable
>> number then?
> Heh, given my amendment above
On 12/07/2012 08:25 AM, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
On 12/07/2012 12:59 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
So on to some initial observations...
Hi Assaf and Padraig,
numfmt claims itself (in --help):
Reformats NUMBER(s) to/from human-readable values.
Yes I was going to get to descriptions and docs at
On 12/07/2012 12:59 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> So on to some initial observations...
Hi Assaf and Padraig,
numfmt claims itself (in --help):
Reformats NUMBER(s) to/from human-readable values.
and in the first line in numfmt.c:
Reformat numbers like 11505426432 to the more human-readable 11G
