On Fri, 2019-09-13 at 17:31 +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 13/09/19 11:08, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Thu, 2019-09-12 at 11:58 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > > Should this have a runtime fallback to stat() if statx() is not
> > > implemented
> > > on the running kernel, or is that already
On 13/09/19 11:08, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-09-12 at 11:58 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>> Should this have a runtime fallback to stat() if statx() is not implemented
>> on the running kernel, or is that already handled at another level?
>>
>
> glibc already does this fallback.
Note we
On Thu, 2019-09-12 at 11:58 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > On Sep 11, 2019, at 7:51 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> >
> > * move loop detection routine into separate function
> > * add a statx-enabled variant that is used when it's available. No need
> > for a full stat since all we care about is
> On Sep 11, 2019, at 7:51 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
>
> * move loop detection routine into separate function
> * add a statx-enabled variant that is used when it's available. No need
> for a full stat since all we care about is the dev/ino.
> * Since dev/ino should never change, set
