On 04/17/2015 11:03 AM, Peng Yu wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/17/2015 10:10 AM, Peng Yu wrote:
Hi, I got the following results when I call sort with -t /. It seems
that 'a/1.txt' should be right after 'a'. Is it the case? Or I am not
using
On 04/17/2015 10:10 AM, Peng Yu wrote:
Hi, I got the following results when I call sort with -t /. It seems
that 'a/1.txt' should be right after 'a'. Is it the case? Or I am not
using sort correctly?
Your assumption is correct - you are using sort incorrectly, by failing
to take locales into
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/17/2015 10:10 AM, Peng Yu wrote:
Hi, I got the following results when I call sort with -t /. It seems
that 'a/1.txt' should be right after 'a'. Is it the case? Or I am not
using sort correctly?
Your assumption is
I have compiled my own 'sort' which deliberately ignores
locale, (more precisely deliberately uses the 'C' locale
by default) for exactly this reason. I don't want to
screw with an environment variable that affects dozens
of things just to get sort to work predictably.
A while ago I offered a
Hi, I got the following results when I call sort with -t /. It seems
that 'a/1.txt' should be right after 'a'. Is it the case? Or I am not
using sort correctly?
$ printf '%s\n' a 'a!' ab aB a/1.txt | sort -t / -k 1 -k 2 -k 3 -k 4
a
a!
a/1.txt
aB
ab
--
Regards,
Peng
