Eric Blake wrote, On 04/06/2011 06:36 PM:
> On 04/06/2011 04:04 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> On 06/04/11 22:26, Assaf Gordon wrote:
>>> I'm wondering if this is a bug (where "-f" is ignored when using version
>>> sort):
>>
>> The same happens for any ordering option.
>> If any is specified for the
On 04/06/2011 04:04 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 06/04/11 22:26, Assaf Gordon wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm wondering if this is a bug (where "-f" is ignored when using version
>> sort):
>>
>> =
>> $ sort --debug -f -k2,2V
>> sort: using simple byte comparison
>> sort: leading blanks are si
On 06/04/11 22:26, Assaf Gordon wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm wondering if this is a bug (where "-f" is ignored when using version
> sort):
>
> =
> $ sort --debug -f -k2,2V
> sort: using simple byte comparison
> sort: leading blanks are significant in key 1; consider also specifying `b'
> sor
Hello,
I'm wondering if this is a bug (where "-f" is ignored when using version sort):
=
$ sort --debug -f -k2,2V
sort: using simple byte comparison
sort: leading blanks are significant in key 1; consider also specifying `b'
sort: option `-f' is ignored
==
My assumption is that