If a user wants to (makes the mistake of) let others delete their files,
it's not your job to teach them otherwise. Compare to real life;
someone leaves a bike on the street unlocked and someone else steals it.
Does it make sense to file a complaint to the police department about not
educating
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Jaroslav Rakhmatoullin
jazzos...@gmail.com wrote:
If a user wants to (makes the mistake of) let others delete their files,
it's not your job to teach them otherwise. Compare to real life; someone
leaves a bike on the street unlocked and someone else steals it.
Regarding previously discussed topic:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2013-02/msg00082.html
Attached is another update, rebased against the latest version.
comments are welcomed,
-gordon
key-comapre.2013-07-02.patch.xz
Description: application/xz
On 07/04/2013 06:33 PM, Assaf Gordon wrote:
Regarding previously discussed topic:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2013-02/msg00082.html
Attached is another update, rebased against the latest version.
comments are welcomed,
-gordon
Thanks Assaf,
This is bubbling up my
Hello,
Regarding old discussion here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2011-02/msg00030.html
Attached is a patch with adds --repetition option to shuf, enabling random
number generation with repetitions.
Example:
to generate 50 values between 0 and 9:
$ shuf --rep -i0-9 -n50
* tests/misc/shuf.sh: Restrict the test to the significant
case where we can't in fact read the unreadable file.
---
tests/misc/shuf.sh |6 --
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/misc/shuf.sh b/tests/misc/shuf.sh
index 171b25a..3e33b61 100755
---
