On 2019-07-31 20:36, Peng Yu wrote:
Hi,
Suppose that I know a md5sum that is derived one of the timestamps
computed below. Is there a way to quickly derive what the original
timestamp is? I could make a database of all the timestamps and their
md5sums. But as the total number of entries increase
Use unix time instead of md5sum
В Wed, 31 Jul 2019 22:36:18 -0500
Peng Yu писал:
> Hi,
>
> Suppose that I know a md5sum that is derived one of the timestamps
> computed below. Is there a way to quickly derive what the original
> timestamp is? I could make a database of all the timestamps and th
2019-08-01 02:08:59 -0600, Assaf Gordon:
[...]
> Three notes:
> 1.
> I would recommend using "-%7.0f minutes" format in "seq"
> instead of "%g", as the latter will result in a scientific notation
> for large values:
>
>$ seq -f '-%7g minutes' 2563200 | tail -n1
>-2.5632e+06 minutes
>
>
Hello,
On 2019-08-01 12:50 a.m., Stephane Chazelas wrote:
2019-07-31 22:36:18 -0500, Peng Yu:
Suppose that I know a md5sum that is derived one of the timestamps
computed below. Is there a way to quickly derive what the original
timestamp is? I could make a database of all the timestamps and t
2019-07-31 22:36:18 -0500, Peng Yu:
> Hi,
>
> Suppose that I know a md5sum that is derived one of the timestamps
> computed below. Is there a way to quickly derive what the original
> timestamp is? I could make a database of all the timestamps and their
> md5sums. But as the total number of entrie
