Re: sha###sum switches
Pádraig Brady writes: > On 22/01/2026 17:02, James E. LaBarre wrote: >> Since a lot of the times I use one of the checksum validators is against >> files that list many more files than I have downloaded (usually ISO >> files), it would make sense that there should be a single-character >> quick-switch for ignoring missing files, along with the long-form >> switch. I need to have that switch more often than most of the others. > > Well you can use --i. > We try to avoid new short options where possible. +1. It is not very fun when implementations disagree on short options. Collin
Re: sha###sum switches
On 22/01/2026 17:02, James E. LaBarre wrote: Since a lot of the times I use one of the checksum validators is against files that list many more files than I have downloaded (usually ISO files), it would make sense that there should be a single-character quick-switch for ignoring missing files, along with the long-form switch. I need to have that switch more often than most of the others. Well you can use --i. We try to avoid new short options where possible. cheers, Padraig
