Hi Laurence,
I hope that the CBOR WG takes good note of these observations:
> On 2021-12-15, at 22:28, Laurence Lundblade wrote:
>
> - CDDL seems just fine for protocol messages
> - CDDL is missing some pieces when combining CDDL-defined protocols (name
> spaces, a publication and reference
I guess for me this thread is about the state of the art for use of CDDL.
- CDDL seems just fine for protocol messages
- CDDL is missing some pieces when combining CDDL-defined protocols (name
spaces, a publication and reference mechanism)
- CDDL is missing some pieces for specifying encryption
