+1 LL
> On Feb 8, 2022, at 7:01 PM, Brian Sipos <brian.sipos+i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > All, > While attempting to use the same kind of hash algorithm agility as the COSE > X509 draft "x5t" parameter [1], I ran into a technical issue that I wrote up > in a ticket [2]. I realize that I just missed the COSE interim to be able to > discuss this, but I think this is a simple issue with (hopefully) a simple > valid/invalid disposition. If valid and it would be helpful for me to submit > a PR, please let me know. > Thanks, > Brian S. > > [1] > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cose-x509-08.html#section-2-5.5 > <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cose-x509-08.html#section-2-5.5> > [2] https://github.com/cose-wg/X509/issues/46 > <https://github.com/cose-wg/X509/issues/46> > > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list > COSE@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list COSE@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
