Hi Ivo,
This document being back on the IESG agenda caused me to notice that I was
delinquent in responding to you. Sorry about that, though I think there is
not much left to actually do.
I looked over the changes (now available in the -08) and they all look
good. Just a few points inline,
Hello Ben,
Thank you for your review and apologies for the delay. Please find below my
answers.
The latest version of the draft is available here
https://cose-wg.github.io/X509/draft-ietf-cose-x509.html. There are some
technical issues that currently prevent me from uploading it to
datatracker,
> On Oct 21, 2020, at 1:27 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 12:54:44PM -0700, Laurence Lundblade wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 21, 2020, at 10:58 AM, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> x5t: This header parameter provides the ability to identify an X.509
>>>
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 12:54:44PM -0700, Laurence Lundblade wrote:
>
> > On Oct 21, 2020, at 10:58 AM, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
> > wrote:
> >
> > x5t: This header parameter provides the ability to identify an X.509
> > certificate by a hash value. The attribute is an array of
> On Oct 21, 2020, at 10:58 AM, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> x5t: This header parameter provides the ability to identify an X.509
> certificate by a hash value. The attribute is an array of two
>
> I suggest using the word "thumbprint" somewhere to motivate the 't' in
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-cose-x509-07: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
