Thank you all who participating in the various rounds, either in-person on on-list.
From the comments, it does not appear we have consensus to make the change. The existing context "CounterSignature0" will remain. - Ivaylo and Matthew COSE WG Chairs On 19/03/29 06:06, Matthew A. Miller wrote: > This is another call for consensus, ending April 5. > > The issue is whether to change the counter signature context string from > "CounterSignature0" to "CounterSignature1". > > The changed value would be more consistent with the structure and text > of the document, however this is a breaking change that could cause > interoperability failures with implementations that have not updated. > > This issue has previously been asked on this list, as well as in the > meeting session in Prague. In the meeting session, a number of people > raised objections because this is a breaking change. > > Please respond by April 5, either saying you support the change (and > possibly why), or saying you do not support the change (and why). > > > Thank you, > > - Ivaylo and Matthew > COSE WG Chairs >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list COSE@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
