Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-cose-msg-19: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-msg/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Stephen, I've seen several documents recently that "reference CDDL informatively" and I don't believe that. So the whole situation with CDDL makes me rather unhappy. Comments on the document: This is a well written document, despite its length. Thank you for that. Some specific comments: I am pretty sure that the CDDL reference is normative. On page 13: media type syntax reference is outdated, you should reference RFC 6838, Section 4.2 has relevant ABNF. In Media type registrations: Applications that use this media type: To be identified This answer is not useful, please specify types of applications that will be using these media types. Something along the lines of what you specified in the Introduction. _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list COSE@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
