Roger that,
over and out.
Johs
> On 8 Jul 2018, at 17:58, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> There might be a misunderstanding of what is required to keep 1.x from being
> deprecated.
>
> It is not a detailed plan, lengthy discussion, or request for features or
> extended support.
>
> It is people spe
Thanks Joan,
Your take on the data is
> To me the data is more proof that asking to keep 1.x on a lifeline is
> serving a vanishingly small amount of users.
I see no proof in the data and I disagree with respect how to best go about
"serving a vanishingly small amount of users."
My take on the
-1
A sunsetting discussion is very welcome, but this proposal is unclear,
based on week arguments and a lack of data, and as decision support
not the best of proposals.
1) To "table" a propoal for voting is problematic
--
