Re: [courier-users] Problem building courier RPMS (not authlib any more:))

2007-04-19 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Wayne Pascoe writes: Hi all, Is there any way to build the Courier RPMs one at a time from the tarball instead of building all of them? For example, just build imap, then just build pop3d, etc... ? No. Compiling esmtpclient.c gcc: Internal error: Killed (program cc1) Please submit a full

Re: [courier-users] Problem building courier RPMS (not authlib any more:))

2007-04-19 Thread Wayne Pascoe
On Thu, April 19, 2007 11:18 am, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Compiling esmtpclient.c gcc: Internal error: Killed (program cc1) Please submit a full bug report. See URL:http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla for instructions. Run memtest to check for bad RAM. It's a virtual server running on

Re: [courier-users] Problem building courier RPMS (not authlib any more:))

2007-04-19 Thread Jay Lee
Wayne Pascoe wrote: On Thu, April 19, 2007 11:18 am, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Compiling esmtpclient.c gcc: Internal error: Killed (program cc1) Please submit a full bug report. See URL:http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla for instructions. Run memtest to check for bad RAM. It's

Re: [courier-users] Problem building courier RPMS (not authlib any more:))

2007-04-19 Thread Federico Baraldi
Il giorno 19/apr/07, alle ore 12:30, Wayne Pascoe ha scritto: On Thu, April 19, 2007 11:18 am, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Compiling esmtpclient.c gcc: Internal error: Killed (program cc1) Please submit a full bug report. See URL:http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla for instructions. Run

Re: [courier-users] Problem building courier RPMS (not authlib any more:))

2007-04-19 Thread Wayne Pascoe
On 19 Apr 2007, at 13:08, Jay Lee wrote: Forgot to mention that I've successfully built courier and courier- authlib RPMS for RHEL5 x86_64 which should be 100% compatible with CentOS5 also, I've your interested in them as a temporary solution to get you up and running, let me know and I'll

Re: [courier-users] Problem building courier RPMS (not authlib any more:))

2007-04-19 Thread Gordon Messmer
Wayne Pascoe wrote: That looks like a bit of a bug with GCC to me, but I've not looked at the code or the compile process yet, so I'll log a bug with the appropriate organisation / group once I work out what is causing this. If I were you, I'd report the bug first. Note that it doesn't