Am 2004-05-24 20:50:47, schrieb Julian Mehnle:
Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had a 100% Debian/STABLE system with courier 0.37
and now I have installed the backports to 0.45.4...
Why don't you try Debian/Testing instead of Debian/Stable with backports?
It's much more maintainable.
Am 2004-05-25 10:04:38, schrieb Alessandro Vesely:
cannot fail. Can you reproduce the failure running the program by itself?
yes
If that's possible, truss can reveal what's going on.
( '/usr/sbin/courierfilter' ) ___
/
| Unable to reserve file
Am 2004-05-24 07:37:24, schrieb Tim Hunter:
Hello,
I have installed a new Workatation based on Debian GNU/Linux WOODY
and tried to install courier-webmin (it was ok) and courier-mta-ssl
__ ( apt-get install courier-mta-ssl ) ___
/
| Setting up courier-mta
Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had a 100% Debian/STABLE system with courier 0.37
and now I have installed the backports to 0.45.4...
Why don't you try Debian/Testing instead of Debian/Stable with backports?
It's much more maintainable.
Julian Mehnle wrote:
Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had a 100% Debian/STABLE system with courier 0.37
and now I have installed the backports to 0.45.4...
Why don't you try Debian/Testing instead of Debian/Stable with backports?
It's much more maintainable.
Because
Martijn Lievaart wrote:
Rumours go around that
unstable is much more stable than testing. :-)
That's to be expected. testing is the first level of testing.
Packages get moved to unstable after they prove that they're working
in the testing area.
Martijn Lievaart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Julian Mehnle wrote:
Why don't you try Debian/Testing instead of Debian/Stable with
backports? It's much more maintainable.
Because Debian/Testing broke my setup *every* time I tried it? Trivial
(ahum) things as libc's that don't work properly?
Gordon Messmer wrote:
Martijn Lievaart wrote:
Rumours go around that
unstable is much more stable than testing. :-)
That's to be expected. testing is the first level of testing.
Packages get moved to unstable after they prove that they're working
in the testing area.
That's wrong.
Gordon Messmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martijn Lievaart wrote:
Rumours go around that
unstable is much more stable than testing. :-)
That's to be expected. testing is the first level of testing.
Packages get moved to unstable after they prove that they're working
in the testing area.
