Hi!

Much better, thanks! :-)

The only potential problem I see, is that now there is only
1 link for the email attachment, which will give you one
large text message with all messages inlined. Before, there
used to be a link for each one of the embedded messages.

When you have some time, could you add some sort of
indicator prior to each message displayed? That way it would
be easier to identify the separation between messages. :-)

Ricardo

----- Original Message Follows -----
> Send courier-users mailing list submissions to
>     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help'
> to
>     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
> specific than "Re: Contents of courier-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Relaying via courier fails due to error 535 (Sam
> Varshavchik)
>    2. Re: mime boundary (Sam Varshavchik)
>    3. Re: courierfax image format/size (Sam Varshavchik)
>    4. Re: messages marked urgent (Eduardo Roldan)
>    5. Re: FAM problem... failed to create cache file:
> maildirwatch (Sam Varshavchik)
>    6. Re: Courier restarting / signalling (Eduardo Roldan)
>    7. Global filters modifying messages. (Rodrigo Severo)
>    8. Re: courierfax image format/size (Keith Pettit)
>    9. Re: Global filters modifying messages. (Sam
> Varshavchik)
>
>
> From: Sam Varshavchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 16:49:14 -0400
> Subject: [courier-users] Re: Relaying via courier fails
> due to error 535
>
> Mirko Zeibig writes:
>
> > Now I get this error on the server, if sending a mail to
> > @picard.inka.de: Jun 12 21:11:09 zeibig courieresmtpd:
> > error,relay=3d::ffff:62.224.163.159,msg=3d"535
> > Authentication failed.",cmd: AUTH CRAM-MD5
>
> Do you actually meet the necessary prerequisites for using
> CRAM-MD5  authentication?  See INSTALL.
>
> If not, remove the CRAM-MD5 mechanism from the server's
> configuration.
>
> Note that you better be using SSL to send mail, otherwise
> without CRAM-MD5  your password is sent over the network,
> unencrypted.
>
>
> From: Sam Varshavchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 16:58:39 -0400
> Subject: [courier-users] Re: mime boundary
>
> Ian Laidlaw writes:
>
> > Courier seems to modify the mime boundary. Is there a
> > good reason why it does this? It breaks clear signed
> > SMIME messages in Outlook, which is of course Outlooks
> > fault, however courier should probably not be messing
> with the boundary in any case.
>
> A message may be rewritten if Courier determines that some
> MIME parameters  are missing, and a default value needs to
> be supplied.
>
> Note, however, that MIME boundaries are not included in
> the signed portion  of multipart/signed MIME content, and
> Courier specifically avoids rewriting  multipart/signed
> MIME content.  If you feed this message =c2=ad=c2=ad for
example
> =c2=ad=c2=ad  to reformime -r8, the signed
quoted-printable
> section will not be re-coded  as 8bit, which would
> normally happen otherwise.
>
>
>
> From: Sam Varshavchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 17:00:35 -0400
> Subject: [courier-users] Re: courierfax image format/size
>
> Keith Pettit writes:
>
> > courierfax is working great.  But I'd like to see if
> > there is anyway to  choose the size of the png that's
> > sent?
> > The PNG is freaking huge and if you need to print it, it
> > can be very  painfull depending on the email client your
> > using.
> > Also for multi-page faxes it creates a seperate PNG for
> > each page.  Is  there anyway to have one PDF instead or
> > something similar?  That makes  more sense to me if
> faxes are more than one page.
>
> If you have the necessary software installed, PDF
> attachments can be  attached.  Thus, attaching a PDF
> document you'll have a pretty good idea  what's going to
> be sent.
>
>
>
> Subject: Re: [courier-users] messages marked urgent
> From: Eduardo Roldan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 12 Jun 2003 17:48:25 -0300
>
> You can modify your 'dial' script to scan the mail queue
> and search the X-PRIORITY string.
>
> On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 13:01, Jeff Jansen wrote:
> > Does courier know (or care) when there is a message
> > marked  "urgent" by a client?  Marking a message as
> > urgent in Kmail  added
> >
> > X-PRIORITY: 2 (High)
> > Priority: urgent
> >
> > to the headers.  But a google search doesn't show any
> > sort  of standard on what is an "urgent" message and
> > what to do  with it.
> >
> > I'm asking because we're on a dial-up link and I've got
> > some  scripts that check the queue every 5 minutes and
> > then dials  out when the queue reaches X messages.  One
> > of my users  asked if there was a way to have it dial
> > automatically when  there was an urgent outgoing
> > message.  Her "solution" right  now is to send X
> > messages to a bad address so that she  knows the queue
> > is full and her "urgent" message will go  out right
> > away.  (I can't decide whether to yell at her or  hire
> > her as a systems administrator! :-)
> > Jeff Jansen
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay
> > Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click
> > here: http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5
> > _______________________________________________
> > courier-users mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
> --  Eduardo Roldan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
> From: Sam Varshavchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 17:16:23 -0400
> Subject: [courier-users] Re: FAM problem... failed to
> create cache file: maildirwatch
>
> JF Guilmard writes:
>
> > Is it a good guess to think that maildrop problems are
> > directly linked to  FAM problems ??
>
> No.  FAM is only used by Courier-IMAP.
>
>
>
> Subject: Re: [courier-users] Courier restarting /
> signalling From: Eduardo Roldan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 12 Jun 2003 18:16:49 -0300
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 13:18, Mitch (WebCob) wrote:
> > Sometimes, when I run makealiases, etc., the process
> > does not seem to properly notify courier of the change.
> > I'm triggering these processes like this (from a php
> > script)
> > `/usr/lib/courier/sbin/makehosteddomains`;
> > sleep(1);
> > `/usr/lib/courier/sbin/makeacceptmailfor`;
> > sleep(1);
> > `/usr/lib/courier/sbin/makealiases`;
> >
> > Now, my question, is if there is nothing wrong with what
> > I'm doing, and courier is just too bust and somehow
> > misses the signal that changes have occured:
> >
> > CAN I individually stop and start the process which
> > effects these settings?
> > Currently, when I call my courer-start script, it does:
> >
> > #!/bin/sh
> > /usr/lib/courier/sbin/courier start &&
> > /usr/lib/courier/libexec/authlib/authdaemond start && \
> > /usr/lib/courier/sbin/esmtpd start &&
> > /usr/lib/courier/sbin/esmtpd-msa start &&
> > /usr/lib/courier/sbin/imapd start && \
> > /usr/lib/courier/sbin/pop3d start && \
> /usr/lib/courier/sbin/imapd-ssl start &&
> > /usr/lib/courier/sbin/courierfilter start
> >
> > If I stop and start, I disconnect all my POP and IMAP
> > users (IMAP being the most noticable of course)...
> >
> > Can I only restart courier or some other needed
> > component INSTEAD of stopping and starting the whole
> thing?
>
>
> I do /usr/lib/courier/sbin/courier restart. This doesn't
> disconnect imap/pop sessions.
> try: man courier
>
>
>
>
> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 19:12:14 -0300
> From: Rodrigo Severo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [courier-users] Global filters modifying
> messages.
>
> I have just tested a perl global filter that includes a
> new header in  the message.
>
> It seemed to work ok. Was this expected?
>
> I remember reading somewhere that global filters shouldn't
> modify  messages but my test worked fine. Was just a case
> of luck at the first  attempt?
>
> Please advise. If this is the expected behaviour, I might
> get  amavisd-new working with courier scanning all
> messages soon.
>
>
> TIA,
>
> Rodrigo Severo
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Rodrigo Severo
> F=e1brica de Id=e9ias
> Fone: +55(61)321 1357
> Fax: +55(61)223 1712
> SBS - Quadra 2 - Ed. Empire Center - Sala 1301
> Bras=edlia/DF - Brasil
> CEP: 70.070-904
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 16:37:45 -0600
> From: Keith Pettit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [courier-users] courierfax image format/size
>
> It took me about a week of dinking around with
> courierfax/mgetty+sendfax/modem before I got it to work
> right.  Here is  what I found out.
>
> 1)  Have to have a fax/modem that does class 2.0 or 2.  If
> you only have  Class 1 your SOL.  Also if you don't
> already have a modem make your life  easy.  Get a external
> , serial, class 2, or class 2.0 modem.  My  paticular one
> is a US Robotics V.92 (Model 5686E) which worked perfect
> out of the box. 2)  You need to make sure to copy over
> courier's "new_fax" file over  mgetty's default "new_fax"
> file.  If your doing RPM's it does that for ya. 3)  Change
> $mgetty+sendfax/sendfax.config so "max-tries-continue"
> says  "n" insteady of "y"
> 3)  You need to edit $courier/etc/faxrc file and comment
> out this line:
>     rw^     .               1
> 4)  Edit /etc/inittab and make sure you have some line
> that's like the  following:
>     mo:235:respawn:/usr/sbin/mgetty -s 38400 /dev/ttyS0
> My fax/modem is a external serial modem so It's ttyS0.
> Also I couldn't  get the inittab configuration to actually
> take until the machine was  rebooted.  I know there's a
> proper way to have the system reload the  inittab but I
> couldn't figure it out. 5)  Use webadmin to configure
> inbound/outbound faxing.   There was no  way I was going
> to spend another week and figure out that file, the
> webadmin did a great job of doing exactly what I wanted.
>
>  From there everything worked for me.  When I was first
> troubleshooting  I tried to diagnois things at their
> lowest level by sending faxes from  the command line, and
> also running the mgetty command to listen for  faxes.
> Which helped me figure out the problems I was having.
>
>
> Good luck and happy faxing!!
>
> Keith
>
>
>
>
>
> Lars Holmstr=f6m wrote:
>
> >I've tried to install the mgetty+sendfax with less
> success. Even if I set >"modem-type fax" I still got the
> loginbanner when I connect. >
> >Do you have any hints ?
> >
> >/Lars
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Keith Pettit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 9:50 PM
> >Subject: [courier-users] courierfax image format/size
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>courierfax is working great.  But I'd like to see if
> there is anyway to >>choose the size of the png that's
> sent? >>
> >>The PNG is freaking huge and if you need to print it, it
> can be very >>painfull depending on the email client your
> using. >>
> >>Also for multi-page faxes it creates a seperate PNG for
> each page.  Is >>there anyway to have one PDF instead or
> something similar?  That makes >>more sense to me if faxes
> are more than one page. >>
> >>Thanks,
> >>
> >>--
> >>Keith
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>-------------------------------------------------------
> >>This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay
> >>Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click
> here: >>http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>courier-users mailing list
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> From: Sam Varshavchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 19:00:47 -0400
> Subject: [courier-users] Re: Global filters modifying
> messages.
>
> Rodrigo Severo writes:
>
> > I have just tested a perl global filter that includes a
> > new header in  the message.
> >
> > It seemed to work ok. Was this expected?
> >
> > I remember reading somewhere that global filters
> > shouldn't modify  messages but my test worked fine. Was
> > just a case of luck at the first  attempt?
>
> Case of luck.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> courier-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
>
>
> [Attachment:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [Attachment:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [Attachment:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [Attachment:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [Attachment:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay
Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here:
http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users

Reply via email to