Re: [courier-users] Re: perlfilter and bcc

2001-12-13 Thread Gordon Messmer
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Gordon Messmer wrote: The control files, as you point out in your previous message to Jim, are necessary to do things like filter based on the recipient, or the sender, or the remote relay. On a related, but entirely separate note: Where, if anywhere, are the

[courier-users] Re: perlfilter and bcc

2001-12-13 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Gordon Messmer writes: On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Gordon Messmer writes: It seems that the simplest way to cancel a message that hasn't been delivered is to return an SMTP style error code, as the documentation suggests. Do you disagree? By the time the

[courier-users] Re: perlfilter and bcc

2001-12-13 Thread Alessandro Vesely
Hi, excuse me for jumping late into this thread, I'm running my own little filter and I am very interested in the filtering protocol (not using perlfilter, I skipped the thread.) Sam wrote: I think that probably the best thing to do is to append the control filename to the message queue id,

[courier-users] Re: perlfilter and bcc

2001-12-12 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Gordon Messmer writes: On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Jim Cooley writes: Is there any way for a perlfilter to see a bcc address, especially if that bcc address is causing the server to deliver the mail to a local account? Any help is greatly appreciated. The

Re: [courier-users] Re: perlfilter and bcc

2001-12-12 Thread Gordon Messmer
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Soon thereafter it was determined that there were some technical issues with that approach, and the correct way was to use the message's internal tracking id, and blow the message away using the cancel mechanism, hence the control file parameter