[courier-users] Invalid Signature

2013-01-15 Thread Lindsay Haisley
Slightly OT, but about half or more of Sam's posts to this list show an invalid signature in my mail reader. The PGP (GPG) ID of the signature is the same - 81E550E2 - whether it shows up as valid or invalid. Has anyone else noticed this, and is there a reason for it, or is it perhaps a local

Re: [courier-users] Invalid Signature

2013-01-15 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Lindsay Haisley writes: Slightly OT, but about half or more of Sam's posts to this list show an invalid signature in my mail reader. The PGP (GPG) ID of the signature is the same - 81E550E2 - whether it shows up as valid or invalid. Has anyone else noticed this, and is there a reason for it,

Re: [courier-users] Invalid Signature

2013-01-15 Thread Lindsay Haisley
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 19:28 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Lindsay Haisley writes: Slightly OT, but about half or more of Sam's posts to this list show an invalid signature in my mail reader. The PGP (GPG) ID of the signature is the same - 81E550E2 - whether it shows up as valid or

Re: [courier-users] Invalid Signature

2013-01-15 Thread Lindsay Haisley
Well the copy sent directly was marked as having an invalid signature as well, so message munging by Sourceforge can probably be ruled out. I don't know. I may try to see how Evolution submits emails to gpg. This may tell us something. -- Lindsay Haisley | We have met the enemy and he is

Re: [courier-users] Invalid Signature

2013-01-15 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Lindsay Haisley writes: Well the copy sent directly was marked as having an invalid signature as well, so message munging by Sourceforge can probably be ruled out. I don't know. I may try to see how Evolution submits emails to gpg. This may tell us something. Well, here's a demonstration of

Re: [courier-users] Invalid Signature

2013-01-15 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello, On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 07:05:38PM -0600, Lindsay Haisley wrote: On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 19:28 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Lindsay Haisley writes: Slightly OT, but about half or more of Sam's posts to this list show an invalid signature in my mail reader. The PGP (GPG) ID of

Re: [courier-users] Invalid Signature

2013-01-15 Thread Lindsay Haisley
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 21:50 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Now, I think I've grown out of my arrogant phase many years ago, but I'm fairly certain that Evolution is screwing up here. Sam, I've been appreciating your work and your knowledgeable arrogance since the days, probably a dozen years

Re: [courier-users] Invalid Signature

2013-01-15 Thread Bernd Wurst
Hi. Am 15.01.2013 20:01, schrieb Lindsay Haisley: Slightly OT, but about half or more of Sam's posts to this list show an invalid signature in my mail reader. The PGP (GPG) ID of the signature is the same - 81E550E2 - whether it shows up as valid or invalid. Has anyone else noticed this,