I've run courier before - long time fan :) - and once I sorted out dependencies
I had no troubles. Not having luck this time. I'm sure it's something I've
missed, but the error isn't very specific "file not found" which I presume
means the auth library - it but it seems to be there.
I've found
Didn't see my message bounce back so can't reply in context, but I found my
"solution".
I don't know why, but the auth-mysql libraries were not copied to the proper
location even though they seem to have been built.
I removed my build folders and reproduced, so I copied the files manually.
Her
Hello Sam, and all.
I'm running the latest, and am having a bit of trouble escaping in maildroprc -
or rather my escape is working but it's not quite working the way expected.
In my maildroprc, I have
UI_Maildir is the users default delivery location.
MAILBOT="/usr/local/courier/bin/mailbot"
/
Thanks for the reply Sam! A follow up question below. :-)
-Original Message-
> From: Sam Varshavchik [mailto:mr...@courier-mta.com]
Sent: May 27, 2014 3:10 PM
To: 'courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net'
Subject: Re: [courier-users] Problems escaping subject line an
> From: Sam Varshavchik [mailto:mr...@courier-mta.com]
>
>> Did something change that escapes are no longer needed or did I miss
>> the point many years back?
>
>No, escaping is certainly needed. Note the backslash in:
>cc "| $MAILBOT … -s\"Subject: AUTO-REPLY: (\$SUBJECT)\" … "
[Mitch says:] I
> From: Sam Varshavchik [mailto:mr...@courier-mta.com]
>
>> Did something change that escapes are no longer needed or did I miss
>> the point many years back?
>
>No, escaping is certainly needed. Note the backslash in:
>cc "| $MAILBOT … -s\"Subject: AUTO-REPLY: (\$SUBJECT)\" … "
[Mitch says:] I
AWESOME Idea. Thanks :-) This post is just to share the completed solution for
anyone who searches later.
For those that come after me...
My issue was delivering an auto response that included the original subject in
a way that was safe. I had been trying to use the subject line I had escaped.
Sam wrote:
> mi...@bitblock.net writes:
>> One remaining question I had - is there any place the different
>> response types (-T reply vs. -T replydsn) are differentiated?
>Not sure what you mean – these options send a response in two different
>formats.
That was my conundr
Sam wrote:
>You need to specify your email address with the -M option, when using replydsn.
Thanks Sam - now I understand - now that I see what it looks like I will stick
with reply :-) my original thought was that by sending in dsn format I might
avoid bounces - but it's not as human readable s
