[courier-users] Re: dot extension file not working

2001-12-18 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Andrew Newton writes: > Bill Michell wrote: > >> >> What's in the .courier-foo file? > > > Good question. I tried just one line with the e-mail address to my PCS > phone. So it is in the format [EMAIL PROTECTED] Suspecting it > might be something wierd with either the format of the e-

Re: [courier-users] Re: dot extension file not working

2001-12-18 Thread Andrew Newton
I found the problem... so for future trouble-shooting when somebody reports these symptoms: Essentially the .courier-foo lookup was failing because the authentication process was failing with authldap. I had it in the list of modules for authdaemon, but had not set it up to work against any

[courier-users] Re: dot extension file not working

2001-12-18 Thread Bill Michell
Andrew Newton writes: > Bill Michell wrote: > >> >> What's in the .courier-foo file? > > > Good question. I tried just one line with the e-mail address to my PCS > phone. So it is in the format [EMAIL PROTECTED] Suspecting it > might be something wierd with either the format of the e-m

Re: [courier-users] Re: dot extension file not working

2001-12-18 Thread Andrew Newton
Bill Michell wrote: > > What's in the .courier-foo file? Good question. I tried just one line with the e-mail address to my PCS phone. So it is in the format [EMAIL PROTECTED] Suspecting it might be something wierd with either the format of the e-mail address or who knows, I changed it t

[courier-users] Re: dot extension file not working

2001-12-18 Thread Bill Michell
Andrew Newton writes: > Scott Morizot wrote: > >> On 17 Dec 2001, at 11:28, Andrew Newton wrote: >> >>> Is there something else that must be done to enable this feature? The >>> permissions >>> on the .courier-foo file are world-readable. >>> >> >> I believe there need to be no group or o