Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
This way spam filter will have to do SPF check for all mail delivered
through backup
MX servers, since we don't SPF check on them...
BTW, what happens with Old-Received-SPF headers when they exist already?
On 31.03.11 19:08, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
They're
Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
I'm fine with Received-SPF being renamed when mail is received from
untrusted host. But for mail received from our (trusted) mail backups:
- the SPF check will apparently fail (thus I better turn if off)
- I could trust the SPF headers made by them, but they get
On 01/Apr/11 12:59, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
I'm fine with Received-SPF being renamed when mail is received from
untrusted host. But for mail received from our (trusted) mail backups:
- the SPF check will apparently fail (thus I better turn if off)
- I could
Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
can I prevent courier from renaming header Received-SPF: to
Old-Received-SPF:
for mail receiver from trusted sources, e.g. MX backups?
Seems that turning SPF checks off does not do that.
On 29.03.11 18:38, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
No, there is no such
Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
can I prevent courier from renaming header Received-SPF: to Old-Received-
SPF:
for mail receiver from trusted sources, e.g. MX backups?
Seems that turning SPF checks off does not do that.
On 29.03.11 18:38, Sam
Helo,
can I prevent courier from renaming header Received-SPF: to Old-Received-SPF:
for mail receiver from trusted sources, e.g. MX backups?
Seems that turning SPF checks off does not do that.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive
Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
Helo,
can I prevent courier from renaming header Received-SPF: to Old-Received-SPF:
for mail receiver from trusted sources, e.g. MX backups?
Seems that turning SPF checks off does not do that.
No, there is no such option.
