?b 日, 2003-10-26 15:32, Stas Bekman ?g?D?G
> I think there is a different reason for not providing all the version numbers.
> I've explained my proposal in the last reply. We shouldn't delegate the
> selection of the right generation to the client, because it doesn't have that
> information.
I
?b 六, 2003-10-25 18:27, Tim Bunce ?g?D?G
> That will be a massive increase in data volume.
I fail to see why. They are, after all, highly redundant and very
gzippable. Also, users may freely specify version ranges that disallows
minor versions, not only major ones.
Maybe some sort of concrete n
?b 六, 2003-10-25 01:54, Stas Bekman ?g?D?G
> > This is a significant issue for the community and so I'd hope
> > someone would offer to help. The relative silence here is troubling.
> > Perhaps it's the wrong list and/or we're the only people subscribed :(
It appears that way. I have just attempt
